Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

e-rhic-ir-l - [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the February 17th eRHIC IR mtg.

e-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: E-rhic-ir-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Bill Christie <christie AT bnl.gov>
  • To: E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the February 17th eRHIC IR mtg.
  • Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:31:36 -0500

Dear All,
Below please find the minutes from the eRHIC IR meeting that we help on February 17th. Please let me know of any corrections, etc.
Greetings,
Bill

Minutes for February 17th eRHIC IR meeting

The primary purpose of this meeting was to ensure that the files containing the details of the IR magnet configurations had been passed to Richard for his simulation effort, and to clear up any questions as/if necessary. There was a problem with the initial files passed, but Bob, Brett, and Richard resolved it, and all is clear and correct.
General Question: Is the placement of the IR magnets the same for the High Luminosity (HL) and the High Acceptance (HA) running scenarios? Answer: Yes.
The configuration that Richad will be simulating is the HL configuration with no cooling. It will start with a proton beam energy of 275 GeV.
A discussion of what the inputs are to the configuration version control that we discussed earlier. The goal of this version control system is that we can completely identify exactly what the inputs and geometry are/were for any simulation result. Originally it was thought that just having version cntrol on the magnet placements and strengths was sufficient for this. In the discussion it came up that one also had to specify the set of beam parameter values used in the simulation, and that magnet configurations and beam parameter configurations were not always matched one to one. We concluded that the version control system would have to track both magnet configuration, and beam parameter setting files. Vahid, as master of the version control, tasked to come up with a scheme to do this.
At this point the original goal of this meeting was achieved, but we continued.
Bob had some new ideas and files that were discussed. Early in this discussion it was concluded that there needed to be a moderate, as well as a high luminosity configuration for presentation at the upcoming review.
Brett points out that one possible configuration of the spectrometer put the scattered proton towards the electron beam. It was pointed out that this (scattered proton towards the electron beam??) has been the default, and it was proposed that we stick with this configuration for the upcoming review.
Also stated that for the review we need to have a 10**34 luminosity option. Bob indicated that there were two paths to 10**34, one of which is without cooling. The no cooling option can't be simulated before the review.
For the review, the baseline path to 10**34 is the one that includes cooling.
Elke brought up a question that she had sent to Vadim: The bunches have a polarization profile in X and Y. Crab cavities cause a rotation. The bunch in the IR is different from the bunch in IR12. Does this impact the polarization profiles? Vadim will follow up on this in a private conversation.
It was pointed out that Steve Tepekian, as well as Sergei ? and Steven ? should be invited to these meetings.
The Agenda for the next meeting, which will be help on March 3rd is:
- Simulation status update
- Synchrotron Radiation
End of meeting




  • [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the February 17th eRHIC IR mtg., Bill Christie, 03/03/2017

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page