e-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: E-rhic-ir-l mailing list
List archive
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the eRHIC IR Design meeting held on July 27, 2018.
- From: Vadim Ptitsyn <vpi76 AT icloud.com>
- To: Vadim Ptitsyn <vadimp AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: "List \(E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov\)" <E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the eRHIC IR Design meeting held on July 27, 2018.
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 09:37:13 -0400
Dear All,
attached are slides about eRHIC luminosities which are mentioned in the
Minutes.
With best regards,
Vadim Ptitsyn.
Attachment:
eRHIC_lumi_in_store.pptx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
> On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Bill Christie <christie AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> Below please find the minutes from our eRHIC IR Design meeting that was
> held on Friday, 7/27/2018. Please note that our next meeting will be on
> Friday August 10th, at 3 pm.
> Greetings,
> Bill
>
> Minutes from the eRHIC IR Design meeting held on 7/27/18
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * We started with a brief discussion of the agenda for the meeting.
> * Brief discussion and presentation by Vadim and Elke on a response to a
> request from Bob Tribble concerning eRHIC luminosities and luminosity
> lifetimes.
> - Vadim walked through the slides that he and Elke had put together.
> - In the discussion it was decided to remove the information/row for
> the number of running weeks per year. This number will rely on future
> operations budgets, and unknown at present.
> - The tables presented, along with Elke's spreadsheet, will be sent to
> Bob Tribble.
> * We then walked through a presentation by Doug on integration into the
> RHIC tunnel (attached file 6IR Layout Development Update 2018-07-27.pptx)
> - Shows 6:00 IR layout with a 22 mr crossing angle
> - Walks through series of slides
> - Includes the Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) version 11
> - There is a discussion about how many crab cavities, and how many crab
> cavity cryo enclosures. Qiong will provide this information to Doug.
> - Point comes up that the ring frequencies are being discussed again
> for possible change.
> - Discussion of how the magnets integrate into the exiting RHIC ring
> (i.e. where beams go back into existing RHIC ring magnets)
> - In the discussion on how to reduce the cost for the IR design,
> integrate the IR magnets and RCS into the RHIC tunnel, and match the beams
> back into the existing RHIC ring magnets expected to be used in eRHIC, the
> three parameters to vary/optimize are:
> - Translate the collision point in the IR (radial translation was
> discussed)
> - Rotate the entire IR magnet setup about a vertical axis through
> the collision point.
> - Change/increase the crossing angle.
>
> DESIGN STUDY PHILOSOPHY:
> The discussion about changes to the "Baseline" eRHIC design, which is
> what appears in the pCDR, led to the following philosophy. We'll embark on
> design studies of how to optimize (reduce) the cost, and ease the
> integration and matching into the RHIC rings, of the IR design. No changes
> will be introduced/adopted into the current "Baseline" design however until
> a more formal process is agreed upon, and then followed. A likely scenario
> is that once we believe that we have a better IR design, with essentially
> all issues investigated, addressed, and resolved, that we'll propose a
> formal change to the baseline design. When this occurs, the formal eRHIC
> design change formalism will be followed.
>
> - We discussed and decided that of the three parameters discussed
> above, for the design study venture, we'll take as the working crossing
> angle 25 mr (Baseline design crossing angle is 22 mr).
> - We discussed a bit whether we could set limits on the likely range of
> the IR Design rotation angle. Agreed that the limits were between 5 and 10
> mr.
> - In looking at Doug's #D renderings of the IR and RCS design in the
> RHIC IR region, the question came up whether the RCS was a "flat" ring
> vertically (i.e. lies in a single horizontal plane). Answer was that yes,
> it is a flat ring, and in the present design it resides 0.5 m above the
> RHIC rings.
>
> * Discussion of the next meeting:
> - Next meeting in two weeks on Friday, August 10th.
> - Draft Agenda:
> - Update from Doug on Integration
> - Update on the designs by Bob and Holger
> - Summary from the EIC Users meeting
> End of meeting
> <6IR Layout Development Update
> 2018-07-27.pptx>_______________________________________________
> E-rhic-ir-l mailing list
> E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/e-rhic-ir-l
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Minutes from the eRHIC IR Design meeting held on July 27, 2018., Vadim Ptitsyn, 08/02/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.