ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: ECCE Public Announcements
List archive
Re: [Ecce-eic-public-l] Review Committee Questions
- From: Or Hen <hen AT mit.edu>
- To: "ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "ecce-eic-ib-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-ib-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "ecce-eic-comp-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-comp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "ecce-eic-dei-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-dei-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Murray, Michael J via Ecce-eic-det-l" <ecce-eic-det-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "ecce-eic-prop-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <ecce-eic-prop-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Ecce-eic-public-l] Review Committee Questions
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:01:43 +0000
Dear ECCE,
Sharing with you now the questions from the Detector Advisory Committee. Answers to these questions are due by Jan. 9th. We do not see any showstoppers here and we should be able to provide detailed answers by the 9th.
The SC and team conveners will followup with specific individuals who we hope can take the lead on answering the different questions. As always, if you are not contacted for any reason but wish to help do not hesitate to let us know.
Thanks,
John Tanja and Or
--
Or Hen,
Massachusetts institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Massachusetts institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Attachment:
DAC-ECCE-Questions.pdf
Description: DAC-ECCE-Questions.pdf
On Dec 21, 2021, at 10:13 AM, Or Hen <hen AT mit.edu> wrote:Dear ECCE,<EIC Questions for January-v3.pdf>We thank you all once again for the great work that went into the proposal. We are getting excellent feedback on lest weekâs presentations and are now starting to work on the next review stage - responding to the committee questions.The questions are attached. They were recently discussed with the SC and Teams/WG conveners who defined a strategy for addressing each question and setup a collection of small working groups to lead the work. While individual collaborators will be contacted to help as needed, we encourage you to read the questions and actively reach out to the relevant contact person for questions you want to help with.We will have our first status update and discussion at the January 3rd bi-weekly meeting.Thanks,John, Tanja, and OrContact person for each question:T1: Rosi; T2: John; T3: Wei-Li*; T4: Xiaochun&Greg*; T5: Fredi*; T6: Jin.G1-3: Tyler; G4: Ping&Xuan; G5: asking for clarifications; G6: Nick*; G7: Bill.P1: Peter; P2: Igor.C1: John Rasson; C2: Doug&Ken.O1: Rosi&Carlos (+SC); O2: John Haggerty&Tanja.E1-6: Martin&David.* TBC.Notes:1. We did not yet receive the additional advisory committee questions thatâs mentioned at the begging of the attached file.2. The slides responding to the questions will be sent to the committee and will not be presented during the January review meeting. Therefore, the slides should speak for themselves and IF the committee will feel that they wan more information they will contact us during the review days (e.g. for a written clarification or for a meeting with the SC).
-
[Ecce-eic-public-l] Review Committee Questions,
Or Hen, 12/21/2021
- Re: [Ecce-eic-public-l] Review Committee Questions, Or Hen, 12/22/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.