ECCE Public Announcements

[Or Hen <hen AT mit.edu>]

Thanks Tyler. Good talk. A few suggestions:

Did you look at who is talking before you? It might be that you don’t need such a detailed introduction on how to get g1 out etc.  It is ok to email people talking before you and ask to see what they are covering so your intro doesn't repeat what was just presented.

Slide 2: I’m missing here the numbers from slide 5 on what we currently know and how uncertain it is. If you want to go further, maybe even a statement on why significant orbital angular momentum is somewhat surprising (standard argument about s-wave etc).

Slide 6: I think it is fair, and uncontroversial, to state the fact that ECCE is the reference design for detector 1. i.e. its not only “One of three EIC projectdetector proposals”.

Slide 9 & 10: there’s a lot to process here for a person seeing it for the first time. Perhaps use circles to point to where each method is doing well.

Slide 10: what’s the point of showing mean? Is this a measure of the MC calibration or are you quantifying physical smearing effects?

Slide 11: its not only the lower x coverage, its also that for the lowest HERA x points they had only one Q2 value and we have quite extended Q2 coverage so can get the gluons better in this region.

Slide 12: you’re showing 12 very small panels. What’s the expected take away? Maybe show only one panel and then flash the others to say they exist.

Slide 14: Please add the reference: Friscic and Nguyen et al. Phys. Lett. B 823 136726 (2021).

Thanks

Or

--
Or Hen,
Massachusetts institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
www.hen-lab.com

On Apr 30, 2022, at 2:49 PM, Tyler Kutz via Ecce-eic-phys-l <ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Good afternoon all,

 

I have uploaded a draft of slides for my talk at DIS2022 here: “Probing the origin of nucleon spin with ECCE at the EIC”.  My talk is on May 5.

 

For the studies shown here, we do not yet have dedicated impact plots with the ECCE pseudodata.  Thus, I simply state that ECCE meets the detector performance requirements outlined in the Yellow Report, and show those impact plots.

 

Any input on the slides are most appreciated!  Thank you.

 

Best,

Tyler

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Ecce-eic-phys-l mailing list
Ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ecce-eic-phys-l

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature