ECCE Public Announcements

[Or Hen <hen AT mit.edu>]

Thanks Ping. Good talk! A few suggestions for your consideration:

Slide 3: This is a very nice figure but the final ECCE design does not have the eHCAL in it so I would replace it…. (Or better yet, make a new version without it and share with the rest of us as its a real nice figure!)

Slide 5: the performance plots seem low quality. Try grabbing them directly from the proposal PDF?

Slide 6: the Q^2 in the first line is accidentally Q_2. Also I would remove the GeV^2 after the 1 and add a space after the 3.

Slide 15: you might want to have a point in the text also about the Q2 lever arm that allows to constraint the production mechanism and thereby reduce the model dependence of the m_a extraction. This is a key point for EIC compared to existing facilities.

In general the talks assumes the audience has quite some prior knowledge. This is not a crazy assumption for a specialized meeting like DIS. At the same time, you might want to explain in each slide that you discuss a measurement what is actually being measured. e.g. say what final state you’re looking at in Dihadron correlations etc.

Thanks

Or

--
Or Hen,
Massachusetts institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
www.hen-lab.com

On May 2, 2022, at 2:03 PM, Wong, Cheuk-Ping via Ecce-eic-public-l <ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,

Please find the second version of the slides in Google Drive:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15mw2gkJshJJPWxhLWvLEvABmm8tWaiKY/view?usp=sharing

I implemented Raymond's comments and corrected a few typos. If you have comments/suggestions, please let me as soon as possible. I need to upload the slides on May 4th.

Cheers,

Ping

---

From: Raymond Ehlers <raymond.ehlers AT cern.ch>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 2:54 AM
To: Wong, Cheuk-Ping
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ecce-eic-public-l] Draft slides for DIS

 

Hi Ping,

Nice slides! I took a quick look, and have just a few small comments:

- s8: "enhance ment" -> "enhancement"

- s9: The uncertainties band is just from the nPDF systematic. I didn't take the difference between reco and true level as a systematic since unfolding will take care of at least some of that, and I didn't think it was clear how to account for it

- s17: I see that you don't have an affiliation for me - I'm guessing it's because you weren't sure what to put? Assuming that's the issue, I'm not exactly sure what to suggest.  I suppose ORNL alone could also be fine since that's where I did the work, but it would be a bit confusing. I wouldn't put LBNL alone since that will definitely cause confusion. Maybe something like "ORNL -> LBNL"? As you prefer

Best regards,

Raymond

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:04 AM Wong, Cheuk-Ping via Ecce-eic-public-l <ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,

I apologize if you received the same email again. The mailing system was complaining about the size of the slides. So I uploaded it to Google Drive: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nJ-GABDe01SUb8BbHqsS6QOrlDG3INTT/view?usp=sharing

Again, my talk is on May 5th. All comments and suggestions are welcome.

Cheers,

Ping

---

From: Ecce-eic-phys-l <ecce-eic-phys-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Wong, Cheuk-Ping via Ecce-eic-phys-l <ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 1:35:53 AM
To: ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov; ecce-eic-phys-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Ecce-eic-phys-l] Draft slides for DIS

 

Hi all,

Please find the first draft of the presentation in the attachment. All comments and suggestions are welcome. My talk is on May 5th.

Cheers,

Ping

_______________________________________________
Ecce-eic-public-l mailing list
Ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ecce-eic-public-l

_______________________________________________
Ecce-eic-public-l mailing list
Ecce-eic-public-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ecce-eic-public-l

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature