eic-bnl-comp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: EIC/BNL Computing discussion
List archive
[Eic-bnl-comp-l] zeonodo (Was: Skipping meeting today?)
- From: Jerome LAURET <jlauret AT bnl.gov>
- To: Jerome LAURET via Eic-bnl-comp-l <eic-bnl-comp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Eic-bnl-comp-l] zeonodo (Was: Skipping meeting today?)
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 10:34:46 -0400
Hello Jerome,
Since it is mentioned in your summary -
I want to add/obtain a little more precision to the Zenodo item -
from what I understood in the last week's Zenodo meeting SDCC indeed
is willing to commit to creation and maintenance of a Zenodo instance
for PHENIX, but my impression was not that it was a firm decision and
work and resources have been allocated.
It is a firm decision and resources HAVE been allocated as reported.
The instance for PHENIX is aimed at being a production instance.
Since at BNL is is a custom installation of Zenodo or actually a port of
the system as opposed to installation this leaves some questions about >
future migration to the Invenio RDM backend and future of the UI/skin
Sorry you lost me here. What you asked is a zenodo instance "as-is"
i.e. like the one deployed at CERN. This is what will be provided.
Milestone M12 (see minutes) indicates all features would be supported
in a transition plane for Invenio RDM.
which is currently a custom fork of the code. I'll discuss this offline
with Carlos and others, just want to register that (unless I'm very mistaken)
a PHENIX instance at BNL is not a firm decision and it's not clear
whether it's optimal.
Thank you,
Maxim
--
,,,,,
( o o )
--m---U---m--
Jerome
<he-him-his>
- [Eic-bnl-comp-l] zeonodo (Was: Skipping meeting today?), Jerome LAURET, 05/07/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.