ePIC pfRICH mechanical design mailing list

[Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>]

Hi Alexander,

I think when we do the scheduling we should know where you are going to be (preferred spot), so that we can schedule around that. If you are with other EIC people and you guys can swap positions, then you have more time.

 

I am hoping we’ll start scheduling in a few weeks.

 

Thanks,

Mandy

 

From: Kiselev, Alexander <ayk AT bnl.gov>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 11:24 PM
To: Todd R Nebel <tnebel AT fnal.gov>, Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>, Evan D. Niner <edniner AT fnal.gov>, Chandradoy Chatterjee <chandradoy.chatterjee AT cern.ch>
Cc: Jung, Andreas <anjung AT purdue.edu>, Alex Eslinger <eslinger AT jlab.org>, Kiselev, Alexander via Eic-projdet-pfrich-mechanical-design-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-mechanical-design-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Details of the MT6.2C hut

  Thank you Todd,

 

  this is very helpful. 

 

  All: if we stay in the 2C area, I think we should pretty much (1) give the table vertical movement up, (2) place HRPPD sensors at phi=0, so horizontally, (3) mimic our three typical angles of interest by a rotation around vertical axis + a horizontal shift. 25.5" is pretty much 1300mm/2.

 

 Todd: the doorway and the table setup in 2C must be wide enough to bring in a cylinder of ~51" diameter and ~20" height, and place it on top of the table, with a horizontal movement capability only, correct?

 

 Evan, Mandy: at which point do we need to decide between 2B and 2C? The problem is that we are adding a substantial amount of material (15-30% of the radiation length), therefore not every group would be happy to be downstream of our setup.

 

 Todd: if we can work in 2B, by how much the red table can be lowered down with respect to the beam line?

 

  Cheers & Happy New Year everybody!

     Alexander.

 

 

 

 

---

From: Todd R Nebel <tnebel AT fnal.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 7:37 AM
To: Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>; Kiselev, Alexander <ayk AT bnl.gov>; Evan D. Niner <edniner AT fnal.gov>
Cc: Jung, Andreas <anjung AT purdue.edu>; Alex Eslinger <eslinger AT jlab.org>
Subject: RE: Details of the MT6.2C hut

 

Good Morning

The 2C hut table will lower as low as 47” from the floor. That would be

19.5” under the beam height

 

Not sure what is needed on the remote movements but if you eliminated

the vertical lift part of the table you can get a height of 40” from the floor,

(25.5” under the beam height) and still have horizontal remote movement.

 

Also consider removing the table all together in there if needed lower and

no movement is needed during your run.

 

Hope this helps

Please ask if more question

Thanks

Todd

 

 

Todd Nebel

Fermi Nat. Accl. Lab

FTBF Technical Coordinator

Chief Operations Specialist

Cell 630-360-0740

 

From: Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 8:50 AM
To: Alexander Kiselev <ayk AT bnl.gov>; Evan D. Niner <edniner AT fnal.gov>; Todd R Nebel <tnebel AT fnal.gov>
Cc: Jung, Andreas <anjung AT purdue.edu>; Alex Eslinger <eslinger AT jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Details of the MT6.2C hut

 

Hi Alexander!

Apologies for not responding sooner.

For the 2C Hut, I’ve included Todd. Todd, can you send info to Alexander, please? See the email below with what they need.

 

For the 2024 test beam, we still don’t have any particular news. We’re waiting for one of the accelerators to actually successfully complete a review and start running, so we have a clear understanding how the rest of these will go. I’m hopefully we’ll have news mid January.

 

Thanks,

Mandy

 

From: Kiselev, Alexander <ayk AT bnl.gov>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 11:26 PM
To: Evan D. Niner <edniner AT fnal.gov>, Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>
Cc: Jung, Andreas <anjung AT purdue.edu>, Alex Eslinger <eslinger AT jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Details of the MT6.2C hut

  Hello Evan, hello Mandy!

 

  can you please provide input to Andreas and Alex, concerning the MT6.2C hut dimensions, see below? Also, any news about the 2024 beam test  prospects would be greatly appreciated.

 

  Thank you & Merry Christmas!

      Alexander.

 

---

From: Kiselev, Alexander
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 9:32 AM
To: Evan D. Niner <edniner AT fnal.gov>; Mandy Kathleen Rominsky <rominsky AT fnal.gov>
Cc: Jung, Andreas <anjung AT purdue.edu>; Alex Eslinger <eslinger AT jlab.org>
Subject: Details of the MT6.2C hut

 

  Evan, Mandy, hi!

 

  How is it going? Any news about the progress of the beam complex certification procedure?

 

  We are going to install a cylindrical detector vessel with an outer diameter of 1300mm, in the MT6.2C hut. The description of this area says the beam is at a 66 5/8 inches height above the floor. 

 

  But what is the lowest table position with respect to the floor level? Also, what is the height of the MT6.2C hut roof? 

 

  Thank you,

    Alexander.