epic-cc-membership-committee-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Epic-cc-membership-committee-l mailing list

List archive

[[Epic-cc-membership-committee-l] ] outcome of my reviews

From: Silvia Niccolai <silvia.niccolai AT ijclab.in2p3.fr>
To: "Steinberg, Peter" <steinberg AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Pietro Antonioli <pietro.antonioli AT bo.infn.it>, epic-cc-membership-committee-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [[Epic-cc-membership-committee-l] ] outcome of my reviews
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:15:36 +0100 (CET)

Dear Peter, Pietro, and all,

I have received feedback from all my institutions except the troublemaker one (Lancaster). So my reviews are complete except that one, all other statements are correctly filled. The only institution not respecting the rule is Karlsruhe. Three institutions (Oslo, Wuppertal, Warsaw) have no authors as they can't commit to do any service work. Some institutions brought up the fact that their engineers/technicians have no ORCID and asked if they can skip that step whenever these people are not listed as authors. I told them that it's ok.

Please let me know what are the next steps.

Best regards,

Silvia

[[Epic-cc-membership-committee-l] ] outcome of my reviews, Silvia Niccolai, 02/11/2025