phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: NPPS Leadership Team
List archive
- From: Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com>
- To: Brett Viren <bv AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 12:20:23 -0400
ah, I forgot that one on the list I'm assembling, thanks Brett
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:19 PM Brett Viren <bv AT bnl.gov> wrote:
Thanks Kolja,
I wonder if the S3 solution also provides the "read-ahead" feature that
makes XrootD so effective at latency hiding.
-Brett.
Kolja Kauder <kkauder AT gmail.com> writes:
> I _think_ Jerome essentially was just intrigued by the new and shiny S3 at the beginning. Work on adding an
> XrootD layer did happen but stalled for reasons I'm not privy to and was put "on pause" in July '22.
> Importantly, the following is an inference, not a thing I've actually heard, but I strongly suspect that SDCC
> will point out that S3 has been working well for ECCE, ATHENA, and now ePIC, so why divert resources from that?
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:44 AM Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Brett. Kolja is well versed in the (Jerome) arguments and can comment.
> Torre
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:42 AM Brett Viren <bv AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi Torre,
>
> Mostly on XRootD:
>
> DUNE @ SDCC is small fry in comparison to EIC @ SDCC, both in resource
> needs and in that BNL is not the host, but XRootD and Rucio are needed
> in DUNE as well. Maybe this "synergy" is somehow useful in your
> arguments.
>
> I don't know the backstory but it seems really weird that XRootD is a
> sticking point. At least I fail to see any effort/resource argument
> against it. Here's why:
>
> Back when LBNE (pre DUNE) and Daya Bay had RACF nodes, Ofer gave us
> great service to set up and operate XRootD servers and clients. These
> groups were in the "free tier" of RACF service with only about a dozen
> nodes each. I think the effort to scale from that to what EIC needs
> would be rather less than linear in the number of nodes. We also had
> the extra complication that the XRootD storage nodes doubled as batch or
> interactive nodes. I expect keeping these roles separate would make for
> an even easier provision. And adding that EIC is not in the "free tier"
> it seems historically inconsistent for the XRootD request to be denied.
>
> It may be useful to know the arguments from SDCC to refuse the request.
> Maybe they can be included in what you are assembling.
>
> -Brett.
>
> Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> > In addition to getting past the BNL embarrassment of not offering XRootD to EIC despite years of
> requests, I'd
> > like to explore ways NPPS could help ePIC with a further and much more impactful change in their data
> > management, adopting Rucio. JLab is working on this now. At BNL it sits (rightly) in the wings while
> we focus
> > on sPHENIX. If people have thoughts on how we can help, including leveraging sPHENIX work without
> impeding it,
> > I'd like to hear them.
> > Torre
> >
> > --
> > -- Torre Wenaus, BNL NPPS Group, ATLAS Experiment
> > -- BNL 510A 1-222 | 631-681-7892
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
> > Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l
>
> --
> -- Torre Wenaus, BNL NPPS Group, ATLAS Experiment
> -- BNL 510A 1-222 | 631-681-7892
> _______________________________________________
> Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
> Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l
>
> --
> ________________________
> Kolja Kauder, Ph.D.
> NPPS, EIC
> Brookhaven National Lab, Upton, NY
> +1 (631) 344-5935
> he/him/his
> ________________________
-- Torre Wenaus, BNL NPPS Group, ATLAS Experiment
-- BNL 510A 1-222 | 631-681-7892
-
[Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Brett Viren, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Kolja Kauder, 04/28/2023
- Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC, Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Brett Viren, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Van Buren, Gene, 04/28/2023
- Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC, Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
- Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC, Van Buren, Gene, 04/28/2023
- Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC, pinkenburg, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Van Buren, Gene, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Kolja Kauder, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Torre Wenaus, 04/28/2023
-
Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] Rucio for ePIC,
Brett Viren, 04/28/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.