NPPS Leadership Team

[Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com>]

Hi all,

Please have a look at the following, tell me if you think it is crazy. Hong wants to have 1-2 pages describing how we could use existing effort in this FY in order to attract DOE AI money for this FY that they are looking to disperse quickly. I think that in an MCP directed plan as below we could identify time fractions of people in several areas of activity/expertise to get experimental MCP services in place and client(s) to use them, and deliver something useful in a short time. You can tell me whether I'm crazy, and tell me what we should be proposing to do for this FY25 scenario instead :-)

I include at the bottom the referenced material in the budget briefing.

  Torre

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: "Shovel ready AI" proposals
To: Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Ma, Hong <hma AT bnl.gov>

Hi, 

These are some musings after a weekend trying out pieces of the emerging 'agentic ecosystem'.

A big domain that is about to open up (as big as LLM tech itself, I think) is active agents representing services that can be interrogated and used by software, LLMs and other human interfaces to create intelligent assistants/actors with powerful capability to act in real time on completely current information, info direct from and curated by the services themselves (no hallucinations from garbage-in data, no blindness to the time since training). Anthropic established an open source protocol, Model Context Protocol (MCP) a few months ago and it is taking off fast. In my opinion it is worth directly getting into now, much more so than playing around with LLM chatbots and extensions like RAG. It is the sort of tech that can be the real basis for "end to end integrated AI from collider to detector to analysis" for EIC, for greatly increasing intelligent automation and user-facing capability in the systems and services we develop like PanDA, etc. This is facility/ops, it is autonomous control of accelerators/experiments, it fits to where the funding apparently is. It is shovel-ready, I think we could start on this instantly in contexts like PanDA, EIC streaming readout, and the ops environments of running experiments if they were willing to explore the possibilities. It is work that should have significant short-term return from moderate time investment so we could put existing people on it without killing their useful productivity.

I'll be talking to people about this but I haven't yet. If you want to include something about this in what you're preparing this week, let me know what you'd like and I'll fast-track the discussing, see whether others agree :-)

  Torre

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 4:35 PM Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Thank you for forwarding!

 

From: Ma, Hong <hma AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 4:34 PM
To: Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com>
Cc: Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>
Subject: FW: "Shovel ready AI" proposals

 

Hi Torre,

 

                If you have ideas about shovel ready AI projects, please let us know, or  work with the other group leaders.

                This can potentially recover some of the lost research funding.

 

                Best,

 

                Hong.

 

From: Denisov, Dmitri <denisovd AT bnl.gov>
Date: Friday, April 11, 2025 at 4:25 PM
To: Rajagopalan, Srini <srinir AT bnl.gov>, Begel, Michael <begel AT bnl.gov>, Kettell, Steven <kettell AT bnl.gov>, sallydawsonbnl AT gmail.com <sallydawsonbnl AT gmail.com>, Slosar, Anze <anze AT bnl.gov>, Jaffe, David <djaffe AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Kotcher, Jonathan <kotcher AT bnl.gov>, Ma, Hong <hma AT bnl.gov>, Deshpande, Abhay <abhay AT bnl.gov>
Subject: "Shovel ready AI" proposals

Folks,

 

As you did hear OHEP is interested in “shovel ready” AI proposals to at least partly compensate FY25 reductions. You can read slides 11-12 from Alan’s recent summary (attached) – this is all we know about this topic for now. In order to get organized and as we are meeting with JoAnne on this topic next Tuesday, I suggest all of you consider what activities in your groups could be “recolored” as AI or become AI with little changes, so the funding can start in FY25.

 

We will need by next Tuesday morning a few initial examples (1-3 from each area):

 

1.            Title and Abstract (a few sentences, not long).

2.            Availability to start activities in FY25.

3.            Approximate duration and funding required (for the full duration of the activities and in FY25). I recommend the full time is 1-2 years, not more.

 

If you send me your drafts by Tuesday, April 15 morning, I’ll combine them into presentable document to discuss with the lab.

 

Many thanks, Dmitri.

wAre there opportunities for additional funding in FY 2025?

•Yes, with successful proposals to Hardware-Aware AI and Early Career Research

•Maybe. In AI. We will be receptive to shovel ready, well-coordinated AI projects

oIncluding Facilities/Operations 

wCosmologists and particle physicists are early adopters and developers of AI

•An epoch of advanced AI is an epoch of discoveries in fundamental physics and cosmology

wHEP is built on statistical analyses of PB-scale data to test theory

•HEP requires a deep understanding of probabilities in the interpretation of data

•This requirement is driving development of AI that can handle probabilistic rigor

oProbabilistically rigorous AI would be a game changer for many fields of science, in addition to being invaluable for applications beyond science

•PCAST Report on Supercharging Research: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Meet Global Challenges

wHEP uniquely pushes development of AI at the edge and real time applications

•Autonomous control of particle accelerators and detectors

•AI for applications in remote power constrained environments

oLow-power high performance AI is most likely to be advanced by HEP

wHEP trains an AI ready workforce with experience in real-world applications using AI on PB scale data