sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Sphenix-calibration-l mailing list
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance
- From: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr>
- To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Hugo Pereira Da Costa via sPHENIX-calibration-l <sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:57:39 -0700
Hello Jamie,
(also adding the sphenix calibration list in cc for furher insight)
If I understand the question right, the plan was to be able to reconstruct the distortions with a precision << the spacial resolution of the GEMs. That would meain ~ 100um at most in phi, and some 200-300um in z. (not clear about the accuracy you need in the radial direction, which we don't measure, since it affects momentum measurement only at second order).
What has been achieved so far: we are able to reconstruct the
distortions induced by 50 kHz Au-Au collisions, averaged over
timescale of the order 1/2h, to this level of accuracy, using
tracks, provided that we have Micromegas detectors in a fraction
of the acceptance. With such reconstructed distortions, we are
able to recover the inv. mass resolution down to < 80 MeV in
low multiplicity events (this has not been tested with upsilons
embeded in MB + Pileup yet). For completeness: the inv. mass
resolution you get for the upsilon without correcting for these
50kHz beam-induced distortions is ~700 MeV (preventing us to do
any physics at all). There are some plots on this (as well as on
the momentum resolution) at
https://indico.bnl.gov/event/10568/contributions/45112/attachments/32417/51575/talk.pdf,
slides 9 and 10.
Reconstructing the shorter timescale fluctuations of the distortions on top of this time average is still a work in progress and cannot be achieved with tracks. However such fluctuations are expected to be much smaller than the average (few 100um instead of few millimeters). The impact of those have not been fully quantified yet either.
What happens without the Micromegas: we would essentially be
incapable of reconstructing these distortions using tracks, due to
the too poor extrapolation precision in the TPC provided by the
MVTX and INTT only. This means that we would have to rely entirely
on the other available methods at hand: the directed and diffuse
laser, as well as the digital currents read on the GEM. Using
these methods is still a work in progress, and so is demonstrating
that they allow to recover the appropriate inv. mass resolution.
In any case, not being able to use tracks to reconstruct the
distortions takes away a lot of redundancy in any procedure we can
derive, and would seriously impact our ability to quantify e.g.
systematic uncertainties associated with it.
To my knowledge, there has been no study done yet about which
maximum collision rate would generate distortions small enough
that we can achieve the required upsilon mass without having to
deal with them. However, assuming that distortions scale with
collision rate, and since 50kHz beam-induced distortions are of
the order of a couple millimeters, I guess you would need at least
a 10x, 20x smaller rate for this to happen. (so 2 to 5 kHz).
Note that beam induced distortions are not the full story though. One can also expect "static" distortions, due to E and B field inhomogeneities and the fact that they might not be parallel. From Ross studies it turns out that these distortions are about 10x bigger than the beam-induced one (so cm scale). However, we expect to be able to correct for them using the directed lasers (although this is still work in progress). If we have Micromegas in place, those could also be adressed using tracks (from either beam, or cosmics).
Hoping this helps. Others in particular from the calibration TF might have additional information.
Best,
Hugo
|| James L. Nagle
|| Professor of Physics, University of Colorado Boulder
|| SKYPE: jamie-nagle
|| WEB: http://spot.colorado.edu/~naglej
||------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
-
Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance,
Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 02/09/2021
- Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] Questions from a place of ignorance, Gunther M Roland, 02/09/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.