Sphenix-calibration-l mailing list

[Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr>]

Hello Christof, (repeating here what we discussed semi-privately)

On the track-based space charge distortion reconstruction, there really 
have not been much new things since last collaboration meeting, mainly 
because things where in a reasonable state by then already.

Obviously, there have been developments on making the TPOT happening for 
real (something which is critical to track-based SC corrections), but I 
expect this to be covered in a separate talk in the detector section

To me, the newest thing that should really be presented at the 
collaboration meeting is the effort, led by Ross, to put all the bits 
and pieces we have on the TPC SC distortion correction in a 
comprehensive flow chart, organized in a first-pass and second-pass 
reconstruction.

We should then emphasize which parts of this flowchart are already there 
(committed, ready to use), which are 'almost there', and which still 
need some significant work. I'll let Ross comment on this (and hopefully 
volunteer to present this).

On that topic, one of the missing parts of the flow-chart, namely the 
ability for the first-pass reconstruction to store the per-job 
space-charge correction matrices in independent, tiny files, together 
with a separate process to aggregate, invert these matrices and produce 
a full map, has been pushed to our repositories last week. So we are one 
step closer to having this flow chart turned into a real thing.

That is all the input I have.

Best,

Hugo



On 6/4/2021 8:58 AM, Christof Roland via sPHENIX-calibration-l wrote:
> Thanks to Klaus for pointing this out, obviously the mail should
> have started with "DeaR Calibration TaskFocre Members"
>
> I sincerely apologize!
>
> This will go onto my list of the more memorable typos or autocorrect failures.
>
> Cheers
>
>     Christof
>
>
> > On 4. Jun 2021, at 16:40, Christof Roland via sPHENIX-calibration-l 
> > <sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dead Calibration TaskForce Members,
> >
> > we are supposed to provide feedback to Dave & Gunther so they
> > can set up the program for the upcoming collaboration meeting.
> >
> > Could you please provide us with a few line response on the
> > topics you would want to highlight at the collaboration meeting?
> >
> > Please also let us know if you would prefer the usual layout
> > if a separate report by each subcommittee or if we should
> > change for this particular meeting to a shorter executive style
> > report to keep the meeting time short and leaving more time for
> > discussion, as Gunther and Dave suggested last General Meeting
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >    Takao & Christof
> > _______________________________________________
> > sPHENIX-calibration-l mailing list
> > sPHENIX-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-calibration-l
> _______________________________________________
> sPHENIX-calibration-l mailing list
> sPHENIX-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-calibration-l