Sphenix-calibration-l mailing list

[Dennis Perepelitsa <Dennis.Perepelitsa AT Colorado.EDU>]

Hi Ben and all,

Thanks for your hard work and being very responsive to questions and suggestions.

I had a request which I think will provide some critical context for what we’re seeing.

Can you produce the ET distribution for the individual EMCal towers which enter your rho*A determination, in central and peripheral events, and especially zooming in on the range near 0? I think we should try to understand the particular pattern which results in “no tower cut” having a lower (and narrower?) rho*A distribution, which then increases (and widens) but then decreases again as you raise the E_threshold. I think looking at the detailed single-tower spectrum down there will help.

Dennis

On Feb 6, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Kimelman, Benjamin <benjamin.kimelman AT Vanderbilt.Edu> wrote:

Hello everyone,

First, thank you all for the feedback over the past few weeks. The comments and suggestions that have been made have really helped improve the analysis.

Attached, you will find a set of slides with that answer the major questions that I received at the Calo Calibrations meeting on Monday.

Additionally, I have updated the note (https://sphenix-invenio.sdcc.bnl.gov/communities/sphenixcommunity/requests/31edcd3e-2a08-46f6-ad11-d1d6f17db320), with much of the same figures in an appendix.

I've also updated my slides for WWND 2024, which can be found here: https://sphenix-invenio.sdcc.bnl.gov/me/requests/446c5efe-62a9-4829-816a-bd766ccc9c78

Please let me know if you have any additional feedback.

Thanks!

Best,

Benjamin Kimelman Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Vanderbilt University benjamin.kimelman AT vanderbilt.edu Pronouns: He/him/his

<UE Data Update.pdf>

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Associate Professor, Physics Department
University of Colorado Boulder