sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX cold QCD topical group

List archive

Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted

From: Alexander Bazilevsky <shura AT bnl.gov>
To: sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:11:03 -0400

Hi John,

A few comments/suggestions to you talk:

9: "Au-shine (polarized)": for me it is a bit confusing; may be add "p-polarized"?

10: I'd use "50-100 mkm" resolution for GEMs instead of "50 mkm"; first, this is exactly what we quoted in our fsPHENIX proposal, and second, it may look less challenging (and less unreachable).

12: This is not the first time when I'm confused with these plots not showing what rapidity they correspond to (despite that the next slide shows it); actually I agree with Abhay to remove this slide.

19: Should you explicitly point on the plots that they are for 200 GeV?

22: Directions for e and p/A are wrong; swap them.

23: Probably for ePHENIX picture the more relevant reference is 1409.1633 ("eRHIC design study"), you may take the title page from there.

Regards,

Sasha.

--
Alexander Bazilevsky
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg. 510D, 2-232
Upton, NY 11973 Tel: 631-344-3712
Email: shura AT bnl.gov
-------------------------------------------------

[Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, John Lajoie, 04/02/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, Abhay Deshpande, 04/03/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, Alexander Bazilevsky, 04/03/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, Alexander Bazilevsky, 04/03/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, Ralf Seidl, 04/03/2017
  - Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, Aidala, Christine, 04/04/2017
    - Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] draft of sPHENIX/fsPHENIX talk posted, John Lajoie, 04/04/2017