sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX cold QCD topical group
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Fwd: Question for STAR and sPHENIX [urgent]
- From: Ralf Seidl <rseidl AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: David Morrison <morrison AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Fwd: Question for STAR and sPHENIX [urgent]
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:23:48 +0900
Hi Dave,
my guess is that STAR has the forward Calorimeter with pre-shower to study not only forward back-to-back di-hadrons but also hadron-photon combinations in search of the color-glass condensate. They had a recent paper on the di-hadrons from p+Al and p+Au on which they want to build.
Unfortunately everything related to the CGC requires very asymmetric collisions and very forward (or rather backward of the A-going direction) instrumentation to reach the low x.
Together with many transverse spin asymmetries being largest in the forward direction these p+A measurements were part of or our motivations to suggest a forward sPHENIX...
At central rapidities you can improve the nuclear PDFs and the nuclear fragmentation functions a bit, but nothing that is absolutely essential for the EIC physics program.
In support of the p+Au program we have the rather unique charged hadron asymmetries that Jeongsu discovered to decrease in p+Au in PHENIX. We can definitely extend on these measruements between the former PHENIX muon arm rapidities and the central charged pion asymmetries from PHENIX. Those figures can be already found in the BUPs, of course.
Maybe others have more comments on that.
Cheers,
Ralf
On 2023-09-12 11:06, David Morrison via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l wrote:
Dear sPHENIX cold QCD'ers,
We received this homework question this evening from the chair of the
PAC, John Harris:
Question to STAR and sPHENIX:The context is that STAR argued in general terms during the PAC
Please provide us with the plots (from the literature? from recent
conference talks by theorists? or from your own efforts?) that
support what you see as a crisp example of how a specific pAu
measurement (either polarized or unpolarized) made in the closing
years of the RHIC program can be compared to which specific future
eA measurement from the EIC, and what this comparison can teach us.
Which is to say please share what you see as “the money plot”
making the case that a specific pAu measurement is particularly
important to enhancing the science impact of the future EIC program.
presentations that p+Au data in Run-24 is critical for understanding
key EIC measurements. Saturation and universality were mentioned.
When pressed on this point, however, they didn't have a specific plot
to show.
If we have such a plot and it's particularly compelling, we could
include it in our answer to this question. We would need to have it
before about 8am ET on Tuesday morning for it to be useful.
Regards,
Dave
--
David Morrison Brookhaven National Laboratory phone: 631-344-5840
Physics Department, Bldg 510 C fax: 631-344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000 email: dave AT bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l
-
[Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Fwd: Question for STAR and sPHENIX [urgent],
David Morrison, 09/11/2023
- Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Fwd: Question for STAR and sPHENIX [urgent], Ralf Seidl, 09/12/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.