Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-cold-qcd-l - Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Poster Draft for Spin 2023

sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX cold QCD topical group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ralf Seidl <rseidl AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: "Riedl, Caroline" <criedl AT illinois.edu>
  • Cc: Devon Loomis <dloom AT umich.edu>, sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Poster Draft for Spin 2023
  • Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:24:24 +0900

Hi Devon,

yes, looks good to me, too.

Cheers,

Ralf

On 2023-09-20 06:34, Riedl, Caroline wrote:
Hi Devon,

Good to go to print from my side!

(Maybe change "transversity distribution" to "transversity PDF" - to
be consistent with "Sivers TMD PDF" right above.)

Best,
Caroline
---
Caroline Riedl
Research Associate Professor
Department of Physics, UIUC

-------------------------

From: Devon Loomis <dloom AT umich.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 11:29
To: Ralf Seidl <rseidl AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>; Riedl, Caroline
<criedl AT illinois.edu>
Cc: sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
<sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Poster Draft for Spin 2023

Hi Caroline and Ralf,

Thank you for the comments. I have tried to address them all in this
updated version of the poster. I could not find a public source for
the DiIFF plot after looking around so instead I have included a
Collins asymmetry plot. I have also gone back and tried to increase
resolution on all plots from the previous version. I will still
include the plots with 62 pb^-1 but will make sure to verbally mention
that the statistical errors would be scaled up by roughly 25% with
updated luminosity projections.

Thanks,
Devon

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:49 PM Ralf Seidl
<rseidl AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Devon,

I generally agree with Caro's comments. For the neutron AN figures,
there exist published plots from either PHENIX or the dedicated IP12

experiment at the beginning of RHIC
(https://inspirehep.net/literature/728677 [1]) that you should use
and
reference.

About the online monitoring plots, the general PHENIX policy is, as
far
as I remember, that non-physics plots are typically ok to show
without
them being published or approved. As such, I think those figures are

probably fine and instructive. Maybe put also a "raw" in front of
"neutron asymmetry from square root formula".

A style suggestion, if you can, I would make the green in the first
formula also a bit darker for better visibility.

Enjoy Spin,

Ralf

On 2023-09-16 07:11, Riedl, Caroline via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l wrote:
Hi Devon,

Thanks for preparing a nice poster for SPIN! I have a few
comments,
most of them minor.

*
General: It would be good if you could add some mentioning of the
2024
pp running (for example, in the center of the RHIC sketch?). In my
view, you don't have to quote an "expected total lumi" number in
the
current situation; but if somebody asks, you could quote from the
table in on page 8 of Dennis' talk at the PAC meeting:


https://indico.bnl.gov/event/20331/contributions/79936/attachments/49639/84911/dvp-PAC-9-11-23.pdf
[2]
[1]
Having said this, the projection plots you show are for the
expected
lumi that was assumed to be correct for several years, that is,
62pb-1. You can compare this to the rightmost column in the
mentioned
table. One can (roughly) say that the error bars (which are
statistical only) in the projection plots you show have to be
scaled
up by a factor of 25% (because of the 50% of reduction in lumi ==>
error goes with the sqrt)

*
Top left box:

*
The A_N formula is hidden a tiny bit at the bottom

*
Middle left box:

*
SPHENIX --> sPHENIX 🙂

*
Bottom left box:

*
The DiIFF projection plot is not in the BUP 2023 (which you cite).
Is
it contained in any of the other references you cite? We have to
make
sure it is a public plot. I believe that SashaB made this plot and
the
last reference I found to it was the CM Jan 2022,


https://indico.bnl.gov/event/14039/contributions/58406/attachments/39124/64698/sPHENIX_CollMeet_7jan2022.pdf
[3]
[2] . Let me know if I can help with pinning down the source.
*
In addition to the general comment above about scaling the error
bars,
in the DiIFF plot you need to entirely ignore the blue points,
since
they are for eta up to 2... which we don't have (|eta_max|=1.1)

*
Top right:

*
The mentioning of "CW" and "CCW" - is it needed? These
abbreviations
do not appear anymore after.
*
The sketch with the colliding bunch patterns is nice. Is there one
for
collisions at IP8 too? 🙂 Could you easily tweak the sketch to
make
one?
*
Also related to the RHIC sketch - you mention "RHIC" only one
time, in
the references. Add/ place it somewhere close to the sketch.
*
Some of the figures have really poor resolution, which may be too
well
visible when printed... (for example but not limited to the A_N
plots)


*
Middle right:

*
Are the PHENIX monitoring plots public?

==> I don't know. Could one of the PHENIX collaborators comment
please?

Best,
Caroline

---
Caroline Riedl
Research Associate Professor
Department of Physics, UIUC

-------------------------

From: sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l
<sphenix-cold-qcd-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on
behalf of Devon Loomis via sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l
<sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 15:45
To: sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov
<sphenix-cold-qcd-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-cold-qcd-l] Poster Draft for Spin 2023

Hello all,

I am attaching a draft of my poster "Preparations for spin physics
at
sPHENIX" that will be presented at Spin 2023 . Any
comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Devon Loomis


Links:
------
[1]


https://indico.bnl.gov/event/20331/contributions/79936/attachments/49639/84911/dvp-PAC-9-11-23.pdf
[2]
[2]


https://indico.bnl.gov/event/14039/contributions/58406/attachments/39124/64698/sPHENIX_CollMeet_7jan2022.pdf
[3]
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l mailing list
sPHENIX-cold-QCD-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l [4]


Links:
------
[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://inspirehep.net/literature/728677__;!!DZ3fjg!51-tW7Rt8-wglJAyjtmZj-vV9lCK1GaZC7xtCFe5zjHX0Fs1i9QtEhxkNsv5zCURq0eLiyKUO2lhI5u5$
[2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://indico.bnl.gov/event/20331/contributions/79936/attachments/49639/84911/dvp-PAC-9-11-23.pdf__;!!DZ3fjg!51-tW7Rt8-wglJAyjtmZj-vV9lCK1GaZC7xtCFe5zjHX0Fs1i9QtEhxkNsv5zCURq0eLiyKUO-ORqKyV$
[3] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://indico.bnl.gov/event/14039/contributions/58406/attachments/39124/64698/sPHENIX_CollMeet_7jan2022.pdf__;!!DZ3fjg!51-tW7Rt8-wglJAyjtmZj-vV9lCK1GaZC7xtCFe5zjHX0Fs1i9QtEhxkNsv5zCURq0eLiyKUO0mEVac0$
[4] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-cold-qcd-l__;!!DZ3fjg!51-tW7Rt8-wglJAyjtmZj-vV9lCK1GaZC7xtCFe5zjHX0Fs1i9QtEhxkNsv5zCURq0eLiyKUO77VukjV$




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page