sphenix-electronics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of electronics
List archive
- From: eric mannel <mannel AT bnl.gov>
- To: sphenix-electronics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: [Sphenix-electronics-l] SiPM Testing
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:51:46 -0400
I have been slow in following up last weeks discussion about SiPM testing at UofM, but here is what I think the goals of this effort should be.
We have to do due diligence and verify that the devices that we are shipped are correct and meet the terms of the contract. That is, the right devices are shipped, the quantities are as stated and that devices in a given tray have a gain of 2.4x10^5 at 25C when the Vop is within the stated range of the tray. Since we do not know the exact Vop of the individual devices in a tray, we need to use the mid-point of the range and measure the gain, correcting to 25C if required. If the precision of the measurement is fine enough, we should see a distribution of gains centered around the nominal with a spread that corresponds to the variation of the gain as a function of bias within the range of the tray. What that distribution looks like is an open question and may vary from tray to tray. Some trays may have a majority of devices with the same Vop (as defined above) to within a micro-volt and others may be spread uniformly over the entire range of the tray. While that might be interesting, it is not critical.
The second part is to group trays together with the same Vop range from multiple deliveries and possibly combine trays to make the assembly process more straight forward.
Keep in mind on the scale of this effort we will not be able to track every individual SiPM and associate them with specific EMCal/HCal Towers. Further more, we will not always be running them at the same temperature ( and the temps may vary as a function of time and location) and we don't know on an large scale if all the devices will track the same way with radiation damage.
While there are a number of interesting questions about the uniformity of devices over a large scale one might want to answer, we are no longer in the R&D stage, but rather production, which means we have to do the minimal testing required to insure that the devices meet our requirements on a time scale that is consistent with the project objectives.
The first 2K HCal devices will be mounted in the next few weeks and we will need to start the EMCal assembly by early August. For the EMCal assembly, while the numbers are yet to be finalized, the next batch of boards will be for of order 2 1/2-Sectors. For this I would like to minimize the number of Vop bins, so as new deliveries come in, the selection of trays should be adjusted to maximize the number of trays (full + combined) for a specified Vop range. For that order, 3500 devices will be required. A followup order for the next 10 1/2-Sectors (3-12) will need another 19K devices. That order I expect to place around the first of September.
We can discuss this more Wednesday.
Eric
--
Eric Mannel, Ph.D.
PHENIX Group
Dept of Physics
Brookhaven National Lab.
631/344-7626 (Office)
914/659-3235 (Mobile)
- [Sphenix-electronics-l] SiPM Testing, eric mannel, 06/17/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.