sPHENIX EMCal discussion

[EdwardOBrien <eobrien AT bnl.gov>]

        Hi Anne,
         OK, thanks. It is easy to use. I like the
        feature that lets you see the processed Latex
        version of the document as you make changes. It
        has some weakness in the version control area that
        Darren is fixing with a GIT front end.

        Ed

On 8/27/2015 12:50 PM, Sickles, Anne M wrote:
> Hi Ed (and all),
>
> After discussion with Craig, I put the main points from the outline from
> the word file into overleaf:
>
> https://www.overleaf.com/2657127qghjbm
>
> I think from here people can work on the sections as discussed at the
> workshop.
>
> We can briefly discuss it next week at the EMCal meeting, but overleaf
> seems very straightforward to use.
>
> Best,
> Anne
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 2015, at 2:06 PM, EdwardOBrien <eobrien AT bnl.gov
> > <mailto:eobrien AT bnl.gov>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > John Haggerty copied me on the proposed outline of the EMCal
> > section of the sPHENIX pCDR. It looked quite comprehensive but
> > I'd like to request two additional topics be added to the subsection
> > on the Overview of the Detector.
> > 1) Justification or Rationalization of the design choices for the
> > subsystem.
> > Why did we choice this energy resolution, granularity, material,
> > geometry, photosensor.
> >
> > It may be obvious to us since we've been working on it for a long time
> > but it won't
> > necessarily be as clear to those at DOE or other nuclear or high
> > energy physicists,
> > especially reviewers, that don't work at RHIC.
> >
> > 2)Include a text-based or tabular description of the steps that takes
> > us from
> > where we are now to a completed detector ready to install. A tabular
> > version of this would
> > be ideal, but I am uncertain how easy this would be to come up with. A
> > text version would be of the form:
> >
> > ///Production and bench testing of both 1-D and 2-D projective towers
> > between now
> >     and the spring of 2016. Beam tests at FNAL withan array of 1-D
> > projective modules
> >     in April 2016 with prototype sPHENIX Calormeter electronics.
> >     Beam tests with an array of 2-D projective modules at FNAL in the
> > Fall of 2016
> >     followed by the start of the design of full-scale supermodule
> > prototype.
> >     Conceptual design of the EMCal throughout FY2017. Bench tests of the
> >     full-scale prototype starting in mid-2017 usingthe next round of
> > the calorimeter
> >     electronics. Final engineering design of the EMCal starting in
> > early FY18 and
> >     concluding in 4QY18. Start procurement process for major EMCal
> > production
> >     components 4QFY18. Production of towers beginning in spring 2019 …..
> >
> > /  I've attached the amended outline of the EMCal section.
> >
> >     Ed
> >
> > /
> >
> > /<EMCal_pcdr_rev1.doc>_______________________________________________
> > Sphenix-emcal-l mailing list
> > Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov <mailto:Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Anne Sickles
> Assistant Professor, Department of Physics
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sphenix-emcal-l mailing list
> Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l