sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
- From: "Lajoie, John G [PHYSA]" <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
- To: "Loggins, Vera" <vloggins AT illinois.edu>, "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:20:40 +0000
Hi Vera, Very nice plot! The THP points in particular had me wondering if there is a limit to the variation of the density that you can tolerate? I would expect that a module-to-module variation in the density (of the absorber) would lead to a variation in the effective sampling fraction, which could degrade the effective energy resolution. I suppose if you knew the density of each module you could make a correction? John On 2/26/2016 4:24 PM, Loggins, Vera wrote:
Hi all, |
-
[Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Loggins, Vera, 02/26/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, David Morrison, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Lajoie, John G [PHYSA], 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Gabor David, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/26/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, Lajoie, John G [PHYSA], 02/27/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
dlynch AT bnl.gov, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/29/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, Craig Woody, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Gabor David, 02/26/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.