Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-emcal-l - [Sphenix-emcal-l] Test Beam

sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Edouard Kistenev <kistenev AT bnl.gov>
  • To: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov, sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Test Beam
  • Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:45:54 -0400

Hi, everyone, I missed morning planning session today and so here are my 1
cent on the subject.

I suggest to start the run with whole system assembled on the stage.
Beginning run with EMC 20m(?) upstream will deprive HCal of access to readout
for at least a week (more likely until April 17th) and will make even cosmic
data taking impossible. Working with all system components for the first few
days will be valuable experience to everyone and will give the HCal data to
analyse and to the whole system the ability to tune intercalibration while
EMCal makes its work upstream in the beam line. The progress made in HB till
today certainly tells us that this is possible.

I also suggest that in those few days of joint data taking we will
concentrate on the momentum range covering what can be of importance (mostly)
to future jet measurements - 4-10 GeV/c. 3 or 4 points to get good data on
system liearity. We will need all PId tools in the beam running because the
beam at those momenta is a mix of e/pi/k. Couple runs at the end with higher
momenta.

Then priority can be given to emcal running upstrem and finally to repeating
full system running with emcal perfectly calibrated and understood.

We may take some data with HCal alone too either at the end of first period
(by keeping readout at HCal for a few extra hours) or at the beginning of the
third one (by moving readout first).

Edward


  • [Sphenix-emcal-l] Test Beam, Edouard Kistenev, 03/16/2016

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page