sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
- From: "Huang, Jin" <jhuang AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Bailey, Virginia Ruth" <vbailey2 AT illinois.edu>, "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:27:00 +0000
Thank you very much for the immediate update.
Here are two more comments :-)
1. The 1 GeV energy spectrum appear contains some background towards the high ADC side that drive the fit wider. I would suggest remove this point from the dE/E vs E fit. 2. A minor thing: the 2 GeV and 3 GeV energy spectrum points show double curves at the peak, e.g. page 6. It could indicate that somehow the x-binning is coupled to the discretization of ADC. It drive Chi2/ndof to arbitrary high values. I would suggest try different binning, e.g. 5.0 or 10.0 ADC units / bin, as a test to investigate this issue.
Cheers,
Jin
______________________________
Jin HUANG
Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department, Bldg 510 C Upton, NY 11973-5000
Office: 631-344-5898 Cell: 757-604-9946 ______________________________
From: Bailey, Virginia Ruth [mailto:vbailey2 AT illinois.edu]
Hi Jin,
The reason the two are different is that there were actually two 1GeV runs at 1200V, but one of them, run 2300, had a strange looking energy distribution (see attached) so I excluded it from the plot. I forgot to exclude it from the combined runs though, which I have now fixed.
Thanks for catching that! Best, Virginia From: Huang, Jin [jhuang AT bnl.gov] Hi, Virginia
Thank you for the update. Nice job!
Meanwhile, could you double check 1200V point at 1 GeV/c? It apparently jumps from 9.5% on page 7/8 to 6.4% on page 10.
Cheers
Jin
______________________________
Jin HUANG
Brookhaven National Laboratory Physics Department, Bldg 510 C Upton, NY 11973-5000
Office: 631-344-5898 Cell: 757-604-9946 ______________________________
From:
sphenix-emcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov [mailto:sphenix-emcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov]
On Behalf Of Bailey, Virginia Ruth
Hello all,
Attached are some slides documenting the analysis of the lead glass runs from the testbeam. We used the same analysis macro used for finding the resolution of the calorimeter to find the PbGL resolution, both individually for the 1100V runs and 1200V runs and with the two sets combined. Let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Best, Virginia |
-
[Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 09/08/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis,
Huang, Jin, 09/08/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 09/08/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis, Huang, Jin, 09/08/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis, woody, 09/08/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 09/08/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis, John Haggerty, 09/13/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] PbGL Testbeam Analysis,
Huang, Jin, 09/08/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.