sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments
- From: woody <woody AT bnl.gov>
- To: Ron Belmont <ron.belmont AT colorado.edu>, sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov, sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:48:02 -0400
Hi Ron and All,
Sorry for the late reply, but I wanted to make one comment about the paper before it got too late. As I believe I suggested to Abhisek a while back, I think we should put in some measure of our e/pi ratio for the combined calorimeter. The individual data is already there, and we say on p.44 that the ratio of the linearity of the electron and hadron response is our e/pi ratio , but I think it would be good to show the actual plot. Normally you would expect to see this in a paper describing the performance of a new calorimeter so I think we should explicitly show this.
Cheers,
Craig
On 10/3/2016 11:36 AM, Ron Belmont wrote:
Dear All,
Many thanks to Jamie for these extremely helpful comments. We would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone else to please provide comments as well. As we stated in the last email, there are no explicit rules for this particular situation, but the test beam paper committee would greatly appreciate comments no later than one week from today (Monday October 10).
Regards,
Abhisek, Jin, Megan, Vera, and Ron
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments,
Jamie Nagle, 10/02/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments,
Ron Belmont, 10/03/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments, woody, 10/11/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] T-1044 2016 paper ready for expert comments,
Ron Belmont, 10/03/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.