sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
- From: Edouard Kistenev <kistenev AT bnl.gov>
- To: Joe Osborn <jdosbo AT umich.edu>
- Cc: Dennis Perepelitsa <Dennis.Perepelitsa AT colorado.edu>, sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Rosi Reed <rosijreed AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] More EMCal Simulations
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:33:20 -0400
Joe, great work and thanks. I do not think you have problems with tower-to-tower calibration. Most likely you simply need to account for leakage from the back. I think 1d calorimeter has tower depth constant with rapidity while 2d is variable.
Edward
On Jun 9, 2017, at 10:17 AM, Joe Osborn <jdosbo AT umich.edu> wrote:Dear EMCalers,<zvtx_10_emcal_sims.pdf>_______________________________________________Please find attached some more simulations studies of the single particle photons and e+/-. These simulations are still single particles but with the z_vertex spread out over +/- 10 cm. It shows that the position dependent correction works well as this 'data' set is completely independent from the previous one.I also simulated the "perfect" EMCal tower again with Jin's suggestion to turn the light guide efficiency to 100%. This is included in the presentation with an updated plot of the EMCal resolutions.Joe---------------------------------------Joe OsbornPh.D CandidateUniversity of Michigan(859) 433-8738
sPHENIX-EMCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-EMCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l
-
[Sphenix-emcal-l] More EMCal Simulations,
Joe Osborn, 06/09/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] More EMCal Simulations, Edouard Kistenev, 06/09/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.