Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-emcal-l - Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] Radiation damage to scintillator

sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Craig Woody <woody AT bnl.gov>
  • To: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov, sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-hcal-l] Radiation damage to scintillator
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:08:04 -0400

Hi John,
Interesting. I'm a bit surprised at the magnitude of the effects a rather low dose. If I'm interpreting their results correctly, they see a decrease of ~ 20% for their PS scintillator for a maximum dose of ~ 30 Krad (Layer 7 in Fig. 3). That's not a very high dose. I'm not sure about the position dependence of the integrated doses we reached in PHENIX, but I know they were ~ 10's of Krad near the beam pipe. It's probably worth have a closer look at those numbers and see what it would be in the vicinity of the the Inner and Outer HCAL tiles. Also, we're planning to do some radiation damage studies of the injection molded acrylic light guides that we plan to use for the EMCAL, so we could also test some of the HCAL tiles at this time as well.

Cheers,
Craig

On 7/19/2017 9:23 PM, John Haggerty wrote:
It's been asked by one of our reviewers, so I was looking at the literature on radiation damage in plastic scintillator. This paper is interesting and close to our situation in the HCAL:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07267

One of the authors of this paper is going to be here for the Sambamurti Lecture on Monday, August 7, we could pick his brain.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page