sPHENIX EMCal discussion

[woody <woody AT bnl.gov>]

Edward,
   That's fine, but I think we also need a talk on the sPHENIX 
calorimeters (presumably one combined EMCAL/HCAL talk, but we could in 
principle think about having two separate talks), in which I would 
presume we would want to show some preliminary results from our beam test.

Craig

On 3/10/2018 5:18 PM, Edouard Kistenev wrote:
> Craig, I am planning to submit talk on large area scintillating tile 
> development and testing for sPhenix Hadronic CALorimeter’s. Unless there are 
> objections the abstract can be submitted any time soon.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 10, 2018, at 12:06 PM, woody <woody AT bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >     The abstract deadline for CALOR 2018 is rapidly approaching and we should 
> > start to think about submitting one or more abstracts to this conference. 
> > It's the main conference on calorimetry in particle physics (which includes 
> > us....) and we should definitely have a showing there. Here's the conference 
> > link: http://calor2018.uoregon.edu/
> >
> >     We should have some preliminary results from the current test beam run at 
> > Fermilab by the time of the conference, and while we will obviously need to 
> > be careful what we say about the results by then, we should be able to have 
> > something to show. The problem is that the conference dates overlap 
> > completely with our CD-1 review, so whoever goes will have to be someone who 
> > doesn't have to be at the review. I should also mention that during the 
> > Director's Review, Jay Marx said he was expecting us to show some results 
> > from the test beam at the CD-1 Review, so we do have some motivation to have 
> > some results by that time. And oh, by the way, no pressure there...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Craig
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list
> > sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l