sPHENIX EMCal discussion

[Zhaozhong Shi <zzshi AT mit.edu>]

Hi Anabel,

After carefully reading the updated draft, I agree that we should not add more details (1D projection) to the uniformity studies and keep it as it is based on the scope of the paper. I just have one question: should the word "data" here be singular instead of plural? Overall, I think the draft is very well-written. Great job! Thank you very much!

Sincerely,

Zhaozhong Shi

-------------------------------------------

NSF GRFP Fellow

MIT Physics PhD Candidate

Building 24-407

77 Massachusetts Avenue, 

Cambridge, MA 02139

zzshi AT mit.edu

-------------------------------------------

---

From: sPHENIX-EMCal-l <sphenix-emcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Romero Hernandez, Anabel <acr4 AT illinois.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 11:49 AM
To: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Sphenix-emcal-l] draft of EMCal test beam paper

 

Hello everyone,

Thank you for the first round of comments on the draft of the EMCal test beam paper! The comments have been taken into account and the draft has been updated. The specific responses to each comment can be found here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AQ84lp_2IyVX13GLbjUwqxCGzumvp1DFKNqQEkY2HEE/edit?usp=sharing

We would like to circulate the updated draft to the full sPHENIX list by the end of this week, and in order to facilitate that I have attached the current version of the draft. Please take a look at the draft and send any further comments before the EMCal meeting on Friday morning.

Best,

Anabel