sPHENIX EMCal discussion

[eric mannel <mannel AT bnl.gov>]

Anabel-

Nice poster.  Couple of suggestions and comments.  

• In the abstract you mention the azimuthal coverage but not the pseudo-rapidity coverage.  You should mention that, which then motivates why you are looking at blocks at eta=1 that you mention in the 3rd panel
  
• While you mention the size of the prototype in terms of eta and phi, helpful to mention the tower size in eta and phi and how that compares to the moliere radius.
• You should mention the depth of the towers in terms of radiation lengths
• When you describe the beam spot size, wording is a little odd, I would suggest "Beam spot size of order several centimeters".
  
• You should really add acknowledgements for the funding agencies (NSF, DOE) and the technical staffs at UofI, BNL and FNAL.
  

Eric

On 5/27/20 7:51 PM, Romero Hernandez, Anabel wrote:

        Dear all,
      
        
      
      
        Attached is a poster prepared for Hard Probes 2020 on the "EMCal
        design, construction and test beam results". I would greatly
        appreciate your comments and suggestions. Please send any
        comments by this Saturday.
        
        Best,
      
        Anabel
      
        
      
      
      
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-EMCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-EMCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l
    
-- 
Eric Mannel, Ph.D.
PHENIX Group 
Dept of Physics
Brookhaven National Lab.
631/344-7626 (Office)
914/659-3235 (Mobile)