sPHENIX EMCal discussion

[Blair Daniel Seidlitz <blair.daniel.seidlitz AT cern.ch>]

Dear Sijan,

Looks good and is approved.  I would move the z-axis title a little so it doesn't overlap the numeric labels.  Also, I would put "eta bin index" not "etabin index" and similarly with phi. 

Best,

Blair 

---

From: sphenix-emcal-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-emcal-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Regmi, Sijan <sr276419 AT ohio.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:29 PM
To: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Sphenix-emcal-l] ] Plot_Approval_DNP_Talk

 

Good afternoon, All,

 

I would like to get approval for one plot in my DNP talk. I presented this at today’s mini calo meeting. I would like to replace one plot on slide 5 from my Monday’s presentation (plot will be on 5^th slide in my DNP talk). I need approval for the plot on the right (the left one is already approved).

 

Previously, I had a plot showing ratio of “measured de-calibration” to “true de-calibration” after few iterations to indicate input de-calibration in EMCal was smoothed out in pi0 embedded HIJING. Now, I want to replace that with pi0 mass plot for all EMCal towers obtained after 9 iterations. This new plot shows de-calibration smooths out after 9 iterations after de-calibration is applied and pi0 peak value converges to 135 MeV in those regions where de-calibration is applied.

The current plot conveys same meaning as previous plot (one I had on presentation on Monday), but I believe current plot I want to have is easier to understand for audience than what I had before.

Please find the plot in the attachment and let me know is there is any question or need more information.

Regards

Sijan Regmi