Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-hcal-l - Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Fw: QM2015 Abstract - HCal Prototype Beam Test (Xiaochun He)

sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: John Lajoie <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
  • To: <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Fw: QM2015 Abstract - HCal Prototype Beam Test (Xiaochun He)
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:05:29 -0500

Hi Xiaochun,

    I think at this point you have no choice to go ahead with the name "sPHENIX" in the abstract. If there is clarity from the new collaboration on the timescale of QM15 then you may have to modify what you say in the poster, but I think this is the only way you can approach this at this point.

My $0.02,
John

On 6/23/2015 9:00 AM, Xiaochun He wrote:

Dear all,


I also added my poster abstract into cvs with revisions based on Megan's comment.

https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/phenix/offline/papers/QM15_poster_abstracts/QM15poster_He.tex?sortby=date&view=log


Megan also raised a very interesting point that I don't have a clear guidance from the collaboration.  How should we use the word "sPHENIX" in our abstracts? I think that it should consistent within the collaboration.


Best,

Xiaochun

--



Xiaochun He
Professor
Department of Physics & Astronomy
Atlanta, GA 30303



From: mjuszkie AT gmail.com <mjuszkie AT gmail.com> on behalf of Megan Connors <meganEconnors AT gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 9:44 PM
To: Xiaochun He
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM2015 Abstract - HCal Prototype Beam Test (Xiaochun He)
 
Hi Xiaochun,

With all the discussions and forming of the new collaboration, is it better to leave out "sPHENIX"? It can easily be removed from the first line of the abstract and the title could say "of the proposed" or "of the proposed new" instead of "of the sPHENIX." In addition, I had a couple minor comments below.

Best,
-Megan

"detector system" to "detector systems"
"plan" to "plans"
"prototype to be performed" to "prototype testing to be performed" or "prototype to be tested"


On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Xiaochun He <xhe AT gsu.edu> wrote:

Dear all,


After consulting with John Haggerty and John Lajoie, I would like to submit the following abstract at QM2015.


===


Prototype Studies for the Hadronic Calorimeter System of the sPHENIX Experiment at RHIC


Xiaochun He for the PHENIX Collaboration


A major new experiment, sPHENIX, has been proposed for systematically studying the properties of Quark-Gluon Plasma with jet probes and upsilon production at RHIC. One of the major detector system of the experiment is an accordion-like hadronic calorimeter (HCal) which consists two segments sandwiching a superconducting solenoid magnet. This poster will present the results from the first HCal prototype beam test at Fermilab and the plan for the second HCal prototype to be performed in Spring of 2016.

===


Xiaochun He
Professor
Department of Physics & Astronomy
Atlanta, GA 30303

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l




_______________________________________________
Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l

--

John Lajoie

PHENIX Deputy Spokesperson

Professor of Physics

Iowa State University

 

(515) 294-6952

lajoie AT iastate.edu


Contact me: john.lajoie



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page