sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
- From: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
- To: "sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:06:00 -0400
While doing some writing on the pCDR, I was looking up some papers by Richard Wigmans, a prominent calorimeter expert (who visited with us early in sPHENIX history), which I put here:
https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/haggerty/sphenix/calorimeter_papers/
If you page through only one, look at
https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/haggerty/sphenix/calorimeter_papers/wigmans_calor11.pdf
which has good advice like
If one wants to make real progress in this field, it is imperative that
scientific integrity be the guiding principle.
in addition to a very clear telling of the history of compensation, and his evidence that you can make e/h = 1 by adjusting the sampling fraction. I couldn't find the exact reference for Fe/scintillator, but the plot of e/h here:
https://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/p/draft/haggerty/sphenix/calorimeter_papers/Screen_Shot_2015-09-15_at_12.00.15_AM.png
seems to be consistent with our experience, where the sampling fraction of the outer HCAL is about 3.5% and the inner is about 7% and we evidence for e/h in the ballpark of 1.3 to 1.6.
--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
John Haggerty, 09/18/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
Craig Woody, 09/18/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
Edward Kistenev, 09/18/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
John Lajoie, 09/18/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers, Edward Kistenev, 09/20/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
John Lajoie, 09/18/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
Edward Kistenev, 09/18/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calorimetry papers,
Craig Woody, 09/18/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.