Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-hcal-l - Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] Calorimeter beam test meeting today

sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Edward Kistenev <kistenev AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Steve Boose <boose AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] Calorimeter beam test meeting today
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:06:47 -0300

Lesson learned.
Thanks and thanks again for keeping both gains for the beam.
Edward

PS. In a month I’ll be asking for 32 of those new preamps to build whole hodoscopic test stations (2 tiles with 8 fibers). We need 32 for the beam. With 80 stuffed you have no more then 16 for other hungrie's.  



Edward Kistenev, PhD
PHENIX Physicist





On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Boose, Stephen <boose AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Edward,

The decree was kind of a joke but the point was that I will no longer be building convoluted reset systems for devices such as the Rasperry Pi just because they contain neither a watchdog or “dead man” timer. The control devices that we are using are the type found in military, medical equipment and automobile engines. That’s why your car doesn’t just shut off in the middle of the Long Island Expressway.    

 

Steve Boose

PHENIX Experiment

Brookhaven National Laboratory

BLDG 510C

Upton, NY 11973

Ph: (631) 344-2897

Fx: (631) 344-3253

 

From: sphenix-hcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov [mailto:sphenix-hcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] On Behalf Of Edward Kistenev
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 11:31 AM
To: Haggerty, John
Cc: sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov; sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] Calorimeter beam test meeting today

 

Who wrote that decree …. why it is about “not to contain” only, without blue/ras - berries it looks like instruction on “how to create void” … 

Otherwise - my summary is trivial: we have an excellent scintillating tiles and we still have a chance to install blends. 

With proper SiPM selection and  dual gain preamps we may have all channels perfectly equalized (there will be only one common to everyone energy scale missing) and ready for the beam even before the cosmic calibration in high bay … But we should still try to do it and test my claim. 

 

                                  Edward

                       

 

Edward Kistenev, PhD

PHENIX Physicist

 

 

 

 

 

On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:47 AM, John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov> wrote:

 

Many people are away today, but we'll have a short test beam meeting
today (Thu Jan 14) in 2-219 at 11am.  Agenda and connection information
here, add anything you'd like to show:


https://indico.bnl.gov/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=1696


--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358
_______________________________________________
Sphenix-emcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l

 





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page