sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion

List archive

Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] ICHEP testbeam talk

From: Craig Woody <woody AT bnl.gov>
To: Achim Franz <afranz AT bnl.gov>, sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov, sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] ICHEP testbeam talk
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:06:19 -0400

Hi Achim,
I think the slides look fine (and also familiar :-) ) and I agree we shouldn't show new or different preliminary results in public other than the ones I showed at CALOR while we're still working on the analysis of the test beam data. Hopefully the next results we show will be "final". However, there is one plot that, to my understanding, has changed that might be worth updating. That is the comparison of the HCAL data with simulation on Slide 11, which happened to agree best with the data at the time, but didn't agree so well at other energies. I believe the simulations have been updated and there is better agreement with the data at all energies now. You can have a look at the comparison with the data that Abhisek showed at one of the recent HCAL meetings (see his Slide 9 at https://indico.bnl.gov/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2276 ) and check with him about the details if you like. It's just meant to be an example of how well our Monte Carlo agrees with the data, but I think that's been improved now and it might be better to show the more recent plot. Other than that, everything looks fine to me.

Cheers,
Craig

On 8/3/2016 7:23 PM, Achim Franz wrote:

Hi, 

here is the current version I plan to show on Thursday 12:45H Chicago time.

Achim

_______________________________________________
Sphenix-emcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l

Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] ICHEP testbeam talk, Craig Woody, 08/04/2016