sPHENIX HCal discussion

["Huang, Jin" <jhuang AT bnl.gov>]

Hi, Craig and Abhisek

 

Here is my understanding from the meeting:

 

The e/h ratio of the whole calorimeter system will be depending on the choice of energy scale between EMcal / HCal. At the choice of optimizing pion energy resolution (as in abhisek’s talk), e/h shower response would be higher than 1, e.g. 1.4 ~ 10 GeV. One can also choose the scale on EMcal / HCal so that it optimizes the energy resolution for a typical jet which has a fluctuating fraction of EM (pi0->gamma) and hadrons. Then we could bring the e/h ratio of the whole calorimeter system to approximately 1 by scale down EMCal energy scale relative to HCal. It would not produce as good resolution for pions, but should give a better resolution for jets and better jet energy scale.

 

Therefore, to produce an e/h ratio plot, we need to choose an energy scale between EMcal / HCal first and state the choice clearly in the paper. I would prefer this choice is to optimize for pion energy resolution, as used in Abhisek’s analysis. Then we can produce the e/h plot simply by taking ratio of the electron and hadron linearity curve ratio. The e/h event sample separation at or below ~12 GeV/c should be very clear in the joint data set just using c2 inner + outer sum. It is also important that our simulation tunes reproduce this ratio, so we could trust its prediction for the jet performance in sPHENIX.

 

Cheers

 

Jin

 

 

______________________________

 

Jin HUANG

 

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Physics Department, Bldg 510 C

Upton, NY 11973-5000

 

Office: 631-344-5898

Cell:   757-604-9946

______________________________

 

From: sphenix-hcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov [mailto:sphenix-hcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] On Behalf Of Craig Woody
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 7:45 AM
To: Abhisek Sen <sen.abhisek AT gmail.com>
Cc: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCAL Meeting 9/21 NOTE NEW TIME

 

Hi Abhisek,
  I don't remember how we left things at our meeting yesterday about including a plot of the e/h ration for the combined  3 part calorimeter, but I think it would be good to include a plot like this in the final paper. We talked about just quoting the number of 1/0.7 ~ 1.4, but that's not what people usually quote about calorimeter performance. The e/h ratio surely has an energy dependence and I think we should show that. It may be as simple as making your balancing plot for the hadronic energy in the EMCAL vs the HCAL at various energies and plotting the ratio of that to electrons (or, rather one over that). Hopefully that wouldn't be that hard to do, and I think it would provide a valuable piece of information about our combined calorimeter system.

Cheers,
Craig

On 9/18/2016 3:41 PM, John Lajoie wrote:

Dear HCAL'ers:

    We've been on hiatus for a while, but it's time again for our HCAL bi-weekly meeting. We will meet this coming Wednesday, 9/21, at 2:30PM BNL time, immediately following the sPHENIX electronics meeting:

https://indico.bnl.gov/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2395

PLEASE NOTE THE NEW DATE, TIME, AND BLUE JEANS RESERVATION.

If you would like to make a presentation at the meeting, please let me know.

Regards,
John

 

--

John Lajoie

Professor of Physics

Iowa State University

 

(515) 294-6952

lajoie AT iastate.edu

Contact me: john.lajoie

_______________________________________________

Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list

Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l