sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
- From: John Lajoie <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
- To: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] How good is the TEDLAR
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:42:24 -0500
Hi Edward, This is interesting, but I'm not sure how to make it
quantitative. What we really care about is the average offset
compared to a typical shower, right? Of course in the IR the tiles
will be between the gaps and I think the lights are typically off
when we are running. If you are worried about single photons then
I would be surprised if this could be enough to affect a typical
shower. Would a better measure be something done with the prototype
and random triggers? You could average the baseline for a bunch of
random triggers under different lighting conditions and see how
much it moves. That would be much closer to the kind of effect we
might experience. John On 4/26/2018 9:01 AM, Edouard Kistenev
wrote:
With help of Rob Pisani we found this week
that white tedlar used in demonstration wrap of HInner tiles is
very leaky thing - lets a lot of light to get through. I got a bit
anxious if black TEDLAR is that much better to protect our tiles
from ambient light with one layer only 30mkm thick.
So we did a not so simple a test (took a bit of
creativity from tester). Unwrapped tile was placed on a sheet of
TYVEK and covered with another sheet of TYVEK and single sheet
of black TEDLAR (see attached pictures). A thick (black on
inside) box with a hole one one side and a source of blue light
inside the box was pressed against the tedlar spread over top of
the tile. Fiber exits were viewed by digital camera. Visually no
difference in the amount of light exiting fibers when light
source on and off was observed. Digital camera is not a great
single photon registrar so the signal from fibers, using image
processor from camera - no signal was firmly established for the
4s exposure. But 8s exposure processed through software does
show clear presence of aa accumulated single photon hits
opposite the fiber exits.
Estimated background -s <1hit in the signal
aperture. Integral is unknown but I asked the kid who did this
test ti dig on internet for means to estimate its value - then
we will have a way to measure tile luminosity in 10 s .
Edward
Picture 1 - Illustration to the setup
Picture 2 - Processed image with 4s exposure
Picture 3 - Processed image with 8s exposure
_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l |
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] How good is the TEDLAR,
Edouard Kistenev, 04/26/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] How good is the TEDLAR,
John Lajoie, 04/26/2018
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] How good is the TEDLAR, Edouard Kistenev, 04/26/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] How good is the TEDLAR,
John Lajoie, 04/26/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.