sPHENIX HCal discussion

[Craig Woody <woody AT bnl.gov>]

Sorry, but in my haste to get this out, I forgot one important item on 
the last slide. Please have a look at these slides instead of the first 
ones I sent out.

Thanks,
Craig

On 5/3/2018 12:22 PM, Craig Woody wrote:
> Dear All,
>   There has been a lot of discussion lately about what we say in the 
> CDR about the energy resolution for the EMCAL and how we present this 
> to the CD-1 Review Committee. During the practice for the plenary 
> talks yesterday, Gunter showed our "Ultimate Performance Parameters", 
> which are physics deliverables that we claim that we will be able to 
> achieve in the final detector. They are important quantities since we 
> are essentially promising the DOE that we will be able to deliver 
> these levels of performance, and we better be sure we can achieve them.
>   I've prepared a few slides that I plan to show at the General 
> Meeting tomorrow (or at least some subset of them) which I wanted to 
> distribute before then to get feedback from people about how they 
> think we should present this. Please have a look at the attached 
> slides and let me know your comments.
>
> Many thanks,
> Craig

Attachment: EMCAL_UPPs_sPHENIX_Gen_Mtg_5-4-18.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document