sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
- From: "Lajoie, John G [PHYSA]" <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
- To: Christopher McGinn <chmc7718 AT colorado.edu>, "sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: James L Nagle <naglej AT colorado.edu>, Megan Elizabeth Connors <mconnors AT gsu.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal Tile Testing at Boulder
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:39:51 +0000
Hi Chris,
Very interesting results. If I am interpreting this correctly it looks like the “bad” tiles are consistent with a lower overall light yield. I’m not sure how to reconcile that with the observation of a different apparent angular distribution of the light exiting the fibers, but perhaps this has more to do with the lower light yield coupled with the logarithmic response of the human eye.
What really worries me is that in addition to the overall light yield there is some additional variation in the tile. I’d like to see if there is a way to quantify this. I was thinking you could normalize each measurement in a tile by the average for that tile and then make a 1D plot of that ratio. The width of this distribution tells you something about the relative fluctuations in response for that tile as a function of location, and I wonder of we would see any significant differences between the two classes of tiles.
And finally – many thanks to everyone involved for the extremely fast response!!
Regards, John
From: Christopher McGinn <chmc7718 AT colorado.edu>
Hello all,
|
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal Tile Testing at Boulder,
Christopher McGinn, 03/13/2020
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal Tile Testing at Boulder, Lajoie, John G [PHYSA], 03/14/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.