Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-hcal-l - Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Follow-up (Complete) Analysis of HCal Tiles w/ Boulder Test Stand

sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Lajoie, John G [PHYSA]" <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
  • To: Christopher McGinn <chmc7718 AT colorado.edu>, "sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Follow-up (Complete) Analysis of HCal Tiles w/ Boulder Test Stand
  • Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:50:39 +0000

Hi Chris,

 

Many thanks for sending these results. It really looks like B25.2095.5867 has a broken fiber at more than one location.

 

John

 


John Lajoie

he, him, his

Professor of Physics

Iowa State University

 

(515) 294-6952

lajoie AT iastate.edu

 

From: sPHENIX-HCal-l <sphenix-hcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Christopher McGinn
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2020 1:07 PM
To: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Follow-up (Complete) Analysis of HCal Tiles w/ Boulder Test Stand

 

Hello all,

This is a follow-up to the previously sent preliminary analysis of the underperforming HCal tiles that was previously sent to the list (and was discussed partially in the biweekly HCal meeting here: https://indico.bnl.gov/event/9090/). I've attached the final analysis, now correcting the scans taken incorrectly. Analysis shows 2/4 sent tiles have anomalously low light output when compared to the B26 tile sent for testing in March. Please let me know if you have questions or comments,

Chris

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page