sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping
- From: Martin Purschke <purschke AT bnl.gov>
- To: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 16:01:10 -0500
Hi Stefan,
you need to be prepared to map to this from the PacketId and in-packet offset as I described in yesterday's CollMeeting talk (and that you are familiar with from PEHNIX). You have 128 channels (two digitizers worth) per packet unless the plan has changed.
As you saw, Saif has already made some mappings etc from the digitizers for the calibrations, and the packet is the same as for the EmCal (that has 192channels, 3 digis worth).
Best,
Martin
On 1/7/22 15:39, Stefan Bathe via sPHENIX-HCal-l wrote:
Hi Eric, Chris, All,
Thanks for the feedback.
OK, looks like we should go with a tower ID based on the digitizer channels
(blocks of 0-63 channels overarching four blocks of 16 channels (sector
thirds of four different sectors), which we map into an integer ID that
increments in both eta and phi. The (eta, phi) ID can then easily be
translated into actual eta and phi. How the tower ID blocks are ordered will
eventually be determined by how the Meritec cables will be plugged in, which
isn’t decided yet, it sounds like.
Regards,
Stefan
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Bathe
Professor of Physics
Baruch College, CUNY
and RIKEN Visiting Scientist
Baruch: BNL:
17 Lexington Ave Bldg. 510
office 940 office 2-229
phone 646-660-6272 phone 631-344-8490
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Jan 5, 2022, at 08:39, pinkenburg via sPHENIX-HCal-l
<sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Stefan,
I looked at the presentations and they are a bit opaque to me but I think I
get the general idea. I would make the software a secondary thought - there
will always be some mapping to translate a channel to row/column, even if it
is some one to one. In terms of how to set up the channel numbers I would
concentrate more on monitoring/debugging needs when using raw data. If e.g.
you run some packet ddump and the channel number tells you directly where
some given tower is located rather than going through some geometry
translation, there is value in that - or if it is easier to make a connection
between slow control and a given tower.
Not sure if this helps - whatever makes running the hcal easier and more
bullet proof should be done. Software can always be recompiled if you got
something wrong even after you are done taking data.
Chris
On 1/4/2022 9:10 PM, Stefan Bathe via sPHENIX-HCal-l wrote:
Dear All, (specifically Xiaochun, Eric, Chris)
Xiaochun asked in today’s HCal Meeting about the HCal channel mapping for his
Geant simulation. As far as I can tell, this was last discussed in the
8/27/19 HCal Meeting:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__indico.bnl.gov_event_6688_&d=DwIGaQ&c=dTXc8cCP8suVpClwB1HRHQACHN4UFMgL7MtSjCbKyts&r=VpzLtnjcGB03vfJuG_p478bcDf7zDOFn2OeUM-jusdY&m=HOtxraNOUgIc4-76m05ZxyZtpgYw4n-p8fGrdxsrtWg&s=9RxZH7QPTVmIlD3px64gHbUwypaf0HdiI0LEJhwZ8aQ&e=
where both Eric and I gave presentations on our ideas of how to map hardware
channels to digitizer channels. I think we basically agreed. In the end,
though, I think, it might be up to the software group (Chris?) to decide
which numbers to assign to the channels. I guess the two options would be to
either adopt the digitizer channel numbering (no additional map needed, but
geometrically more complex) or to have numbers simply increment in z and phi
(geometrically simple, but additional map needed).
The other open question is where to start counting. Naturally one would like
to start counting at phi = 0 (and at the South end, so along the z axis).
But the sector at phi = 0 (and at phi = 180 degrees) have their outer radius
combs vertical. Therefore phi = 0 is in the center of a sector, not at the
edge. This would introduce an offset with respect to the digitizer channel
number, which is ugly. The answer to this question might also depend on
which sectors get plugged into which digitizer boards/crates, which Eric and
Steve would know. (I’m saying this because it might make sense to start
counting at channel 0 of a digitizer board.)
Regards,
Stefan
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Bathe
Professor of Physics
Baruch College, CUNY
and RIKEN Visiting Scientist
Baruch: BNL:
17 Lexington Ave Bldg. 510
office 940 office 2-229
phone 646-660-6272 phone 631-344-8490
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.bnl.gov_mailman_listinfo_sphenix-2Dhcal-2Dl&d=DwIGaQ&c=dTXc8cCP8suVpClwB1HRHQACHN4UFMgL7MtSjCbKyts&r=VpzLtnjcGB03vfJuG_p478bcDf7zDOFn2OeUM-jusdY&m=HOtxraNOUgIc4-76m05ZxyZtpgYw4n-p8fGrdxsrtWg&s=BKDeCcnB7JXDQcAC2Q7d74DAsFXwQssxireUDZiijuc&e=
--
*************************************************************
Christopher H. Pinkenburg ; pinkenburg AT bnl.gov
;
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.phenix.bnl.gov_-7Epinkenbu&d=DwIGaQ&c=dTXc8cCP8suVpClwB1HRHQACHN4UFMgL7MtSjCbKyts&r=VpzLtnjcGB03vfJuG_p478bcDf7zDOFn2OeUM-jusdY&m=HOtxraNOUgIc4-76m05ZxyZtpgYw4n-p8fGrdxsrtWg&s=nu-FeBKygAFlKapywWhtOzbpikwq6f-KC2G7V7CRjIw&e=
Brookhaven National Laboratory ; phone: (631) 344-5692
Physics Department Bldg 510 C ; fax: (631) 344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000
*************************************************************
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.bnl.gov_mailman_listinfo_sphenix-2Dhcal-2Dl&d=DwIGaQ&c=dTXc8cCP8suVpClwB1HRHQACHN4UFMgL7MtSjCbKyts&r=VpzLtnjcGB03vfJuG_p478bcDf7zDOFn2OeUM-jusdY&m=HOtxraNOUgIc4-76m05ZxyZtpgYw4n-p8fGrdxsrtWg&s=BKDeCcnB7JXDQcAC2Q7d74DAsFXwQssxireUDZiijuc&e=
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l
--
Martin L. Purschke, Ph.D. ; purschke AT bnl.gov
; http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~purschke
;
Brookhaven National Laboratory ; phone: +1-631-344-5244
Physics Department Bldg 510 C ; fax: +1-631-344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000 ; skype: mpurschke
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
Stefan Bathe, 01/04/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping, Eric Mannel, 01/04/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
pinkenburg, 01/05/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
Stefan Bathe, 01/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
Martin Purschke, 01/07/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping, Eric Mannel, 01/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
Martin Purschke, 01/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] HCal channel numbering/mapping,
Stefan Bathe, 01/07/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.