Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-hcal-l - Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Hcal online monitoring items for comment

sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: pinkenburg <pinkenburg AT bnl.gov>
  • To: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Hcal online monitoring items for comment
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:29:10 -0400

Hi Justin,

before this becomes a gospel - the 2 hours for event building and availability of "seconds worth of data" is a guess. There are technical considerations which might cause significant longer times. E.g. one would have to run a lot of short jobs in sdcc which is not made for this. We have limited cpu's,  setting a large enough number aside to run this might impact our capability to process enough events through our fixed latency reconstruction. I would rather have some statements what is needed and some justification (what would you do with this information 2 hours after the run has ended? How does this affect the data taking compared to having this information from a regular q/a pass? Is 2 seconds out of 3600 seconds a reasonable sample to base any data taking affecting decision on?

We need an estimate of the number of events required.  The number of events needed for e.g. full tower slope fits just exceeds what can reasonable be done as a fast check based on a few seconds worth of data. Keep in mind the 100Hz we saw in PHENIX (together with the fact that only few online monitoring codes actually managed to run at that speed), we will likely be better off now but the processing time of the monitoring code will make sure you will not get that many events (compared to the daq rate).

Chris



On 7/18/2022 9:03 AM, Frantz, Justin via sPHENIX-HCal-l wrote:
Hi Hcal'ers,
I think a few of the hcal management folks have expressed that what I presented last week at the calo calibrations meeting for both calos seemed reasonable enough for the Hcal as well, with a few exceptions.   Since then there have been some further evolution at DAQ mtg and EMcal mtgs I wanted to share, plus just give an overall rundown so that we can  come to a consensus at tomorrow's calo calib mtg (10:30am), and then present that consensus at the Software meeting (which I can do but I would welcome any Hcal'er that is interesting in taking the lead on this to feel free to become involved even in what we present).  
The main new developement was that it was determined that it will indeed be too difficult  to put markers to directly identify LED events, so we should plan not to have those.   For EMCal it is presumed (although since John Haggerty was on vacation, there might not be FINAL confirmation on the possible LED firing patterns) that we can probably still identify LED events because "ALL"  towers in a ~sector will be fired during them.  For Hcal is it possible very central events might  have a decent probability of firing all 1500 towers in one event? which may hamper-- simply from multiplicity it seems possible...  (couple thousand particles per event in most central).   We should probably determine this rate, if anyone has data to confirm and measure the rate, I can check it in MDC2 Hijing maybe not by tomorrow.    Anyway, it's not necessarily that important to identify the LED events, I think the verdict is still out on that, and we will probably try to as much as possible, but we already also seem to have agreed on the other fast feedback monitoring methods TOO,  like rolling average hits per tower  ie  a map of this, that can serve to probe similar info.
So here is the current list of monitoring items (please comment or bring discussion to calo mtg tomorrow morning)  the things I've highlighted in red are unique for the Hcal, the other items are also envisioned for EMcal (e.g. could use common code)
Shift crew : -------------------- -like emcal monitoring in PHENIX -2D Channel map (summative info based on below)      -Tower hits /event   per tower based on rolling averges      -Tower energy mean (or eqiuv) per tower (rolling avg)           (whole spectra per sector?)      -PIN diode data if in data stream?
      -whatever can be gathered from LED events if ID-able       -temperatures, leakage currents, etc... ?   
      -timing t0 check per channel  -text with out lying channel warnings -total global energy in each (I&O) whole system per event
Expert  (Onl Mon based) ----------------------- -mean pedestal for all towers (e.g. 2D map display) from peak extraction -individual 2D Channel maps of above quantities -Tower slope gain drift check per channel (? TBD) -temperature , leakage currents, etc. NOT here

Separate gui -- Expert/ possibly some for "Voltage Operation Shifter" 
------------------------ -temperature, leakage currents, etc.  from database.

With event-built events on SDCC fast reco pass (~2 hrs delay) -------------------------- -Total ALL-calo energy per event -Full tower slope fits -Calibration items





 ----------------------------------------------  Justin Frantz, Ph. D.  he  RHIC UEC/Diversity Working Group  Brookhaven National Lab, sPHENIX Experiment  Associate Professor  Ohio University Dept. Of Physics and Astronomy     frantz AT ohio.edu     646-228-2539    PERSONAL ZOOM MEETING:  369-910-7530   Password:  1    https://us02web.zoom.us/j/3699107530?pwd=TkZLeU1MY2d5eUpqeTJ5WUJTRHlVUT09  

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list
sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l

-- 
*************************************************************

Christopher H. Pinkenburg	;    pinkenburg AT bnl.gov
				;    http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~pinkenbu

Brookhaven National Laboratory	;    phone: (631) 344-5692
Physics Department Bldg 510 C	;    fax:   (631) 344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000

*************************************************************



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page