Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-l - Re: [Sphenix-l] Draft DNP talk

sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Joe Osborn <jdosbo AT umich.edu>
  • To: Rosi Reed <rosijreed AT lehigh.edu>
  • Cc: "sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-l] Draft DNP talk
  • Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:26:45 -0500

Hi John,

One small comment on page 11 - if you could use the resolution plot for the EMCal from the note on page 26 then we will have consistency between your plot and also the plots that Megan are showing at the IEEE conference.

Thanks,

Joe



---------------------------------------

Joe Osborn
Ph.D Candidate
University of Michigan

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Rosi Reed <rjr215 AT lehigh.edu> wrote:
Hi John,

This is definitely a very nice 20 minute talk....  But at 10+2, I
think it would be very difficult to get through!  I think trying to
talk about everything that has happened will be a bit much.

My suggestions:
Remove slide 6 - A HI audience knows what GEANT is

Slide 8 - I think the technical details will be overwhelming to be
people in this context, perhaps move to back-up (you can note the
important details when you get to the slides with calorimeter
details).
Slide 13 - This falls into the same category as slide 8.  Or perhaps
combine them giving the salient top level details (for instance, that
we're using SiPMs).

For the calorimeter slides, I think it is important to emphasize the
test beam results - perhaps have a quick summary for this section.

I would also move slide 14 into the back up, it's a beautiful
schematic but not easy to grok in a minute.

Magnet - I would just condense this to a single slide, the only detail
that has changed recently (at least for the outside world) is that the
high field tests will start.

This will give you more time to spend on the TPC, which I think has
seen a lot of work that hasn't been shown much to the outside world.
Maybe repeat the upsilon plot (or move some other simulation plot here
if one is ready for prime time).

Personally, I would emphasize cd-0 again in the conclusions.

See you in Pittsburgh!
Rosi

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:26 PM, John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please find a draft of my talk at DNP this coming Thursday afternoon
> (October 26, 2017) here:
>
>> https://bnlbox.sdcc.bnl.gov/index.php/s/PLMO1ZvHWnTLraH
>
>
> It's a little long, I'll probably trim it somewhat in responding to
> comments.  Let me know if you have trouble accessing it, I'm trying the BNL
> competitor to Dropbox.
>
> --
> John Haggerty
> email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
> cell: 631 741 3358
> _______________________________________________
> sPHENIX-l mailing list
> sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l



--
Rosi Reed
Assistant Professor, Physics Department
Lehigh University
(610)758-3907
16 Memorial Drive East Office 406
Bethlehem, PA 18015
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page