Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-l - Re: [Sphenix-l] 12/18/18 EC meeting notes

sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Itaru Nakagawa <itaru AT bnl.gov>
  • To: sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-l] 12/18/18 EC meeting notes
  • Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:05:31 +0900

Dear Gunther, Dave and tracking task force group,

 We respect the scientific decision of 2 layers of INTT and will work on the optimization based on 2 layers from now on. Thank you of hard work by the task force. 

Regards,

-Itaru

On 2018/12/20 6:11, Ming Liu wrote:

Hi Gunther, Dave and all,

It is very good to see that we have reached at an agreement on this.  I am convinced that the proposed configuration is a good balance between various hardware constrains and physics performance.

MVTX is entering the phase of global mechanical system design and it is very important that we all, MVTX, INTT, TPC groups … coordinate the integration effort under the OSI to make sure sPHENIX global tracking is optimized. Nice work done by the software integration task force!

 

Cheers,

Ming   

 

-- 

Ming Xiong Liu

P-25, MS H846                     TEL: 505-667-7125 

Physics Division                            631-344-7821(BNL)

LANL                                               630-840-5708(FNAL)

Los Alamos, NM 87545      FAX:  505-665-7020

 

 

From: sPHENIX-l <sphenix-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Gunther Roland <rolandg AT mit.edu>
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 1:49 PM
To: sphenix-l <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Sphenix-l] 12/18/18 EC meeting notes

 

 

Friends,

Many thanks again to the members of the Inner Tracker Task Force and everybody else who helped with the task force studies, and to the participants of the yesterday's productive meeting!

As presented at the collaboration meeting, and discussed yesterday, the optimal INTT configuration needs to achieve a balance between minimizing material over the sPHENIX tracker and calorimeter acceptance and reliably providing crucial information for pileup disambiguation and tracker calibration. The principal parameter in this optimization is the number of INTT (sub-)layers, with the precise radial position of the layers, the sensor layout (z vs phi strips) and details of the stave design having a smaller performance impact. The task force recommended 2 layers (4 sublayers) to reliably and with sufficient redundancy provide at least 1INTT space point on each reconstructed trajectory. 

Following the recommendation by the task force and the EC discussion, we will proceed with a 2 layer INTT design with phi-strips for all sublayers. The task force and INTT team in consultation with the OSI will on a short time scale converge on the ladder type and radial position for the two layers, so that we can proceed to detailed mechanical engineering soon. The INTT team is encouraged to develop detailed specifications of the INTT performance and to maximize the number of available spares. The final design should ensure that the material budget within or close to the |eta| < 1.1 acceptance is optimized within the given constraints, e.g., through the margin between active area and support structures and choice of radial position.

Thanks again to everyone who participated, and Happy Holidays!

Gunther and Dave

_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-l mailing list sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l


_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page