Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-l - Re: [Sphenix-l] [Sphenix-jet-structure-l] Draft for Jet Parallel at RHIC/AGS

sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Perepelitsa, Dennis" <dvp AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Christopher McGinn <chmc7718 AT colorado.edu>
  • Cc: "sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-jet-structure-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-jet-structure-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-l] [Sphenix-jet-structure-l] Draft for Jet Parallel at RHIC/AGS
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:25:37 +0000

Hi Chris,

Thanks a lot for the nice draft slides. 

Below are some combined comments from the Colorado group, from myself and Jamie Nagle: 

JLN:
Note the agenda here:   https://indico.bnl.gov/event/9385/
Excellent font choice and layout 
slide 6 - rate good for maximum statistics and also minimal physics bias
slide 7 - EMCal has tungsten powder, fiber design (spaghetti calorimeter).   No crystals.
slide 7 - not sure about terminology.   The front-end electronics (FEE) often refers to the digitizer board that we are working on with Chi and that sits in a rack.   I think the boards on the detector are the pre-amp and shaper boards (?)
slide 8 - I think it is fine to say "rapidity" instead of "pseudorapidty" and thus keep the line alignment better.
slide 9 - nice to reference the IEE article
slide 11 - "combination" -> "combined"
slide 15 - "First measurements" -> sometimes called "Day-1 Measurements"
slide 15 - a lot of plots with lots of labels, maybe add a cartoon or text above each one (e.g. jet-jet, g-jet, with some arrows)
slide 15 - again I like to align text, example would be to return and start new line with "sPHENIX can ..."
slide 16 - excellent
slide 21 - not for this week, but it would be great (DVP) if we can make the left plot corrected for the EM-scale of the calorimeter jets.    Then one can compare the shapes of the distributions in a more apples-to-apples way.   
Very good to practice walking through the slides for time.   You have a lot of information and do not want to get stuck on words.

DVP: 
slide 6: perhaps add two-pi azimuthal acceptance? (this seems like a minor point, but it’s important for some physics measurements - such as containment asymmetrically quenched dijet pairs, characterization of total energy flow in the event, etc.)
slide 6: I would add “unbiased triggering on jets in pp reference data” - an issue at RHIC 
slide 9: you might say something about the test beams more broadly: “Multi-year campaign of test beams at FTBF with successive EMCal+HCal prototypes.” ? 
slide 11: maybe “0.1x0.1” rather than 4x4? in any case, I think the re-towering detail is probably less important than a brief description of the algorithm. you could write “iterative algorithm to estimate dE_T / deta d(layer), while attempting to exclude jets from the estimate”
slide 14: I think it’s valuable to add that for tower jets, the reconstruction and calibration can be identical in pp as in Au+Au (the UE subtraction “factorizes”) which can result in very efficient cancellation of uncertainties - key for physics!
slide 15: these plots are fine to show some expected kinematic ranges with good “out of the box” reconstruction capability. for a look at expected physics sensitivity, you could make a slide with, for example, Figs 7.2 in our Beam Use Proposal: https://indico.bnl.gov/event/7881/attachments/30176/47160/sPH-TRG-2020-001.pdf - not sure if you have the room 
slide 15: a minor point - not sure if worth mentioning - but you could add that due to smaller ISR/FSR, one has an even tighter initial photon-jet pT correlation at RHIC 
slide 23: “daily” is probably an over-dramatization, but no strong objection :) 

Dennis

On Oct 20, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Christopher McGinn <chmc7718 AT colorado.edu> wrote:

Hello all,

Here is a rough draft of my talk representing the sPHENIX jet work in the RHIC/AGS user's meeting later this week. 

I will be adding attributions (both for materials and to individuals responsible for various studies), fixing some of the mis-alignments, and clarifying text. 

Please let me know what other suggestions you have, and thank you for your time,
Chris 




---------------------------------------------------------
Christopher McGinn
PostDoctoral Associate
University of Colorado Boulder
chmc7718 AT colorado.edu 
"Pretty cool"
---------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-jet-structure-l mailing list
sPHENIX-jet-structure-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-jet-structure-l

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Assistant Professor, Physics Department
University of Colorado Boulder






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page