Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-l - Re: [Sphenix-l] Review on a Draft Paper on EMCal Signal processing with ML

sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Maxim Potekhin <potekhin AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "Perepelitsa, Dennis" <dvp AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Rinn, Timothy" <trinn1 AT bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-l] Review on a Draft Paper on EMCal Signal processing with ML
  • Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 19:46:42 -0400

Hello Dennis,

Your comments are deeply appreciated! Thank you.

This is the  link to the new updated version, corrected as per your suggestions:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S_7QTwybKweuFdSxssSsuiWPLrZiyttD/view?usp=sharing

Here are my itemized comments to your suggestions (which I took into consideration
when correcting the paper, to a large extent) --

On 3/15/2023 9:49 PM, Perepelitsa, Dennis wrote:
L41: “for event definition purposes” was a bit mysterious to me. I think the time is needed to reject signals not associated with a real beam-beam crossing, right?

Corrected. The language was indeed awkward, I've corrected it now.

L62: I found myself curious about the specific type of interpolation. Was this a spline, polynomial, something else?
It's actually linear -- it's the fastest, and given the factor 15 oversampling we expected it to be adequate.
And, I did a numerical comparison with a spline, and they match at more than 6 decimal places, so our expectation was
correct. It's enough precision. I've added add a couple of words to elucidate that.


L91: would it be useful to give a citation or definition for the “modified Landau distribution” ?

Done. There is a seminal paper where this functional form is derived for Landau, I've enclosed the citation.



L125-126: is there any potential issue with using a training sample with a distribution over energies that may not match the distribution of energies to which the ML method will be applied? For example, if the samples from the test beam are roughly similar for each energy, but in real data this will be a steeply falling distribution. Or is this mitigated by the template shape changing minimally with E?

The dependency on the mix was there but not steep. I did some empirical tweaking of the mix and
picked the one which produced the most precise inference. I have added a couple of words
to clarify that situation.


L178 and L181: There is no Figure 4 - should this be Figure 3?

This was a leftover from Tim and I tweaking the graphics, panels etc, it's corrected now.

Ref. 4: the ROOT authors have a requested citation - https://github.com/root-project/root/#cite .

Done, thank you.


You might check if there is some specific way Refs. 5-9 like to be cited, rather than just as a website.

These URLs are really the best sources. There is a strong technical angle to these, and this will be lost in
a paper reference. Any conference presentation based on this won't be as good. If the referee requests that
I'll change this.

Thank you for the work you invested in reviewing this paper. Please let Tim and I know if you have further comments.
We would like to close out by COB tomorrow, Friday, since the weekend is the deadline for the submission.

Best regards,

Maxim




On Mar 10, 2023, at 6:11 PM, Maxim Potekhin via sPHENIX-l <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear All,

Thanks to Dennis for pointing out my omission of not including the line numbers.
I created an additional copy with these included:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tCUCmqScIFHa7uaIY3YBhdIopK2UbrMK/view?usp=sharing
Please let me know if anything else needs fixing.
Best regards,
Maxim

On 3/10/2023 3:50 PM, Perepelitsa, Dennis wrote:
Hello Maxim,

Could you please circulate a version with line numbers? It may also be useful to copy the EMCal list.

Dennis

On Mar 10, 2023, at 3:42 PM, Maxim Potekhin via sPHENIX-l <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

Tim Rinn and I have prepared a draft paper for the proceedings
of the ACAT 2022 Conference.

Title: "A Machine Learning Method for calorimeter signal processing in sPHENIX" The current author list: "M.Potekhin and T.Rinn for sPHENIX Collaboration"
We are asking for your comments for this draft publication, and will
greatly appreciate it if you send them by Thursday, March 16th, as the
submission deadline is the 19th.

The link to the PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aZOO4a5bAQjha4bqBWAmnmcuyGIshQUv/view?usp=sharing
Thank you,

Maxim and Tim

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Associate Professor, Physics Department University of Colorado Boulder
on sabbatical at Brookhaven National Laboratory


_______________________________________________ sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l

Dennis V. Perepelitsa
Associate Professor, Physics Department
University of Colorado Boulder
on sabbatical at Brookhaven National Laboratory





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page