sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

[Megan Connors <meganeconnors AT gmail.com>]

Dear Oliver,

Thanks Oliver for the updated poster. It looks great. I have a few minor suggestions for you to consider before printing.

Intro:
-“overlaps those” to “overlaps with those”
-Subscript T in pT

-Change the HCal photo's caption to “OHCal, magnet, and IHCal”

-I was thinking you could make the title “Recent results from commissioning” a bit more exciting. Even just changing to “First results from commissioning data!” Sounds better in my opinion or make it a different color to highlight it more.

-Change “Jet physics predictions” to “Jet physics projections”

Best,

-Megan

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:04 PM Oliver Suranyi via sPHENIX-l <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Ejiro, Dennis, all,

Thank you very much for the feedback!
I updated the poster based on your suggestions.
If you have any additional comments, let me know until 5pm, because I
have to submit the poster for printing today.

Best regards,
Oliver



On 2023-06-07 20:00, Ejiro Umaka wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Nice poster. I have few comments. Please see below:
>
> In the top right plot titled Calibration of the outer oHCAL with
> cosmic muons. I would change the wording a bit, because this is not
> finalized, it was a step to see if the cosmic muon simulation
> generates a shape similar to the data. Also the set up was with the
> entire oHCAL. I assume the finalized calibration should involve a
> tower by tower calibration.
>
> A small cosmetic change will be useful for the plot right below
> showing a correlation between the outer and inner hcal. The distance
> of the x-axis title to the x-axis is not the same distance as in the
> y-axis. Although the appropriate persons have been notified, I leave
> this here since there was another presentation from sPHENIX with the
> same plot at the same conference.
>
> For the sPHENIX detector, are you against using the one here:
> https://www.sphenix.bnl.gov
> This way there is no need for the text stating that the sEPD and MBD
> are not depicted.
>
> Right below the sPHENIX detector, I believe we agreed that simulations
> should be named sPHENIX simulation not sPHENIX G4 Sim.
> Following up on these plots, is there a need to state that the
> underlying event subtraction does not include flow? Does the audience
> care? I also have trouble reconciling showing the centrality
> dependence in the jet energy scale at low pT- is the point to say we
> don't have our UE subtraction under control in this range?
>
> In the jet physics predictions section what does the audience gain by
> stating: most theoretical models have not been able to simultaneously
> describe the RAA and v2? Can you make your point clearer?
>
> Lastly, in the R-dependence of the RAA, it might be useful to change
> the wording from sPHENIX can make an accurate measurement in this
> region to something like sPHENIX measurement will cover this kinematic
> region and help to reduce the tension between the ALICE and ATLAS
> measurements. I think using "accurate", while I'm confident with what
> will be done at sPHENIX, the statement may appear too strong and may
> imply that the other LHC measurements might be inaccurate.
>
> Best regards,
> Ejiro
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:24 PM Oliver Suranyi via sPHENIX-l
> <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> I will bring a poster to the Initial Stages 2023 conference (June
>> 19-23).
>> I attached the draft version of the poster to this mail.
>> Let me know if you have any comments by June 14, so I will have time
>> to
>> print the final poster.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oliver
>> _______________________________________________
>> sPHENIX-l mailing list
>> sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-l mailing list
sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l