sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of the superconducting solenoid
List archive
- From: Achim Franz <afranz AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Gupta, Ramesh C" <gupta AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: "sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:32:33 -0400
Hi,
here is a reply from Wuzeng Meng about the field with no return yoke:
Achim,
Base upon the information provided by Achim, I confirmed that with the SC solenoids alone (without any magnetic materials), the central field is ~1.25 T @ 4596 A; and ~ 271 Gauss @ 100 A.
Attached figure shows the B = constant contours if the axis of solenoids is aligned with Z-axis, and coils are powered to 100 Ampere only. The peak field is near the coil edges (over 320 Gauss); the 5-Gauss line intersects the Z- axis at +/- 660 cm, and intersects at general radius around 576 cm (due to cylindrical symmetry around common axis of 6 solenoids).
Good luck for your 100 A test.
Wuzheng
Yes. I tried your Opera-2d model. If I re-set your magnetic material to Air (material =0; mu =1.0), then your new solution will give Bo around 1.25 T.
Wuzheng
and this was his reply for the 100A test:
Base upon the information provided by Achim, I confirmed that with the SC solenoids alone (without any magnetic materials), the central field is ~1.25 T @ 4596 A; and ~ 271 Gauss @ 100 A.
Attached figure shows the B = constant contours if the axis of solenoids is aligned with Z-axis, and coils are powered to 100 Ampere only. The peak field is near the coil edges (over 320 Gauss); the 5-Gauss line intersects the Z- axis at +/- 660 cm, and intersects at general radius around 576 cm (due to cylindrical symmetry around common axis of 6 solenoids).
Good luck for your 100 A test.
Wuzheng
Attachment:
BaBar_sole_B-contour.pptx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
I'll run my model with 1000A and see what I get for the field valies.
Achim
On Oct 13, 2014, at 18:42 , Gupta, Ramesh C <gupta AT bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Mike,Yousef
Thanks.
Do you have the details of the iron in the original design?
Best regards,
-Ramesh
gupta AT bnl.gov
www.bnl.gov/magnets/staff/gupta
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Makdisi, Yousef I
Sent: 10/13/2014 6:37 PM
To: Anerella, Michael D; Haggerty, John; sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Cc: Gupta, Ramesh C
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test
Thanks I stand corrected. That is why we added the idea that we need a
simulation (Ramesh's).
Yousef
On 10/13/14 9:03 AM, "Anerella, Michael D" <mda AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>Yousef,
>Just to be clear - I said the forces should not be higher without iron.
>Ramesh of course is the expert and has since made some estimates.
>Regards,
>Mike
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sphenix-magnet-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov
>[mailto:sphenix-magnet-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov] On Behalf Of Makdisi,
>Yousef I
>Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 1:26 PM
>To: Haggerty, John; sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>Subject: Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test
>
>Hello John,
>
> Mike Anerella had a brief discussion on this issue. Mike thinks with
>no steel, there is minimal forces on the coils. But he fringe field in
>the area could be the problem.
> We were thinking that one can calculate the forces as well as the
>fringe fields to see the severity. Of course, then related issue would be
>the need for a high current power supply as well as quench protection.
>
>Regards,
> Yousef
>
>On 10/10/14 1:18 PM, "John Haggerty" <haggerty AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>>I asked Pasquale what they did at Ansaldo to test the BaBar solenoid,
>>and I asked him about possibly coming to BNL for a day or two at some
>>point:
>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: BaBar
>>> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:33:51 +0200
>>> From: fabbric <pasquale.fabbricatore AT ge.infn.it>
>>> To: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
>>>
>>> John,
>>>
>>> so, very soon, you will have the coil in your lab. That's very good.
>>>
>>> Coming to the test, we did a partial test at Ansaldo without the iron
>>>yoke.
>>> The current was limited at 1/3 of the nominal current just for
>>>avoiding problems with magnetic forces. However some not negligible
>>>fring field was present (you need a large area around the coil free
>>>of magnetic materials and limited access)..
>>>
>>> Next year I will have to go to Fermilab. If you inform me about your
>>>plans I can try to couple visit to Fermilab with a visit to BNL
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Pasquale
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Pasquale Fabbricatore
>>> INFN Sezione di Genova
>>> via Dodecaneso 33, 16146 Genova Italy Direct tel + 39 010 3536340
>>> Laboratory + 39 010 3536437 Secret.fax + 39 010 313358
>>> E-mail pasquale.fabbricatore AT ge.infn.it
>>> WEB page http://www.ge.infn.it/~fabbric/
>>
>>--
>>John Haggerty
>>email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
>>cell: 631 741 3358
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sphenix-magnet-l mailing list
>>Sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-magnet-l
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sphenix-magnet-l mailing list
>Sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-magnet-l
_______________________________________________
Sphenix-magnet-l mailing list
Sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-magnet-l
-
[Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
John Haggerty, 10/10/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Makdisi, Yousef I, 10/10/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, Than, Yatming (Roberto), 10/10/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Anerella, Michael D, 10/13/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Makdisi, Yousef I, 10/13/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Gupta, Ramesh C, 10/13/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, Makdisi, Yousef I, 10/13/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, John Haggerty, 10/13/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, Achim Franz, 10/14/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, Achim Franz, 10/15/2014
- Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test, Phillips, David B, 10/14/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Gupta, Ramesh C, 10/13/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Makdisi, Yousef I, 10/13/2014
-
Re: [Sphenix-magnet-l] Higher current test,
Makdisi, Yousef I, 10/10/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.