sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX discussion of the superconducting solenoid
List archive
[Sphenix-magnet-l] strain gage DAQ system discussion ... (why 22-bit)
- From: Kin Yip <kinyip AT bnl.gov>
- To: "sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-magnet-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Sphenix-magnet-l] strain gage DAQ system discussion ... (why 22-bit)
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:11:53 -0400
Hi, I've put Carl Schultheiss' presentation related to the strain gage DAQ system (under "Past Presentation") : https://collab.external.bnl.gov/sites/sPHENIX-Magnet/Past%20Presentations/2016-6-9%20Strain%20Gage%20DAQ%20system.pptx As Carl has predicted, there was no real controversy. We now wait for Winston Pekrul to tell us whether he prefers LAN/GPIB and we can make up the PO etc. Carl's "required resolution" page (ie. 1st page) mentions about inches (distance) ... But tust to write for myself, maybe a bit simpler (after I what Piyush/Carl/Zeynep have educated me) version is something like this: What we have measured (during the low-field test) were usually no. 350.xxx ohm and the reference resistances are around 350.yyy ohm. From the data that we've measured, the bigger examples of delta-resistance ( 350.xxx - 350.yyy) may be 0.26 Ohm, the smallest may be like 0.012 Ohm. With 1 mA constant current source, these are 0.26 mV (260 uV) and 0.012 mV (12uV). For a 22-bit instrument, you usually get ~20 bits (due to noise etc.). For an input range of 1 V and 20-bit, 1 V/2^20 ~ 9.53E-7 V ~ 1uV. Here, we use 1 uV (1 micro volt) to measure the smallest differences like 12 uV, which is (barely) enough. So, we really need 22-bit instrument .... not 16-bit instrument. This is to convince myself that we really need 22-bit. Kin |
- [Sphenix-magnet-l] strain gage DAQ system discussion ... (why 22-bit), Kin Yip, 06/09/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.