sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL
- From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
- To: Ross Corliss <rcorliss AT mit.edu>, "christof.roland AT cern.ch" <christof.roland AT cern.ch>
- Cc: "Chiu, Mickey" <chiu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Todoroki, Takahito" <todoroki AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, Sanghoon Lim <sanghoon.lim AT colorado.edu>, sphenix-maps-l <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Molly Taylor <mitay AT mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 02:56:45 +0000
Hello Ross and Molly,
Interesting! Some comments/questions:
1) Why electrons? There will be significant tails on the extrapolation for electrons after 8% of a radiation length in 4 layers of INTT.
2) You extrapolated to the inner field cage at 20 cm. The inner tracking radius is 30 cm, where space charge distortions will be worst. Can you push it to 30 cm?
3) I am surprised by the Z resolution for "11" and "111" on slide 4 and 5. I would have expected these to be much worse than those for any configuration having a "0" layer. The implication of this is that the Z resolution is dominated by the MVTX (which is actually not insane, it has 5 micron resolution per layer vs ~40 micron resolution for the INTT "0" layers). This raises the question of whether the INTT matters at all to the Z extrapolation accuracy. Can you try it with no INTT at all?
4) You are using a fixed momentum of the particles, and the extrapolation trajectory in r-phi is always the same at fixed momentum. I assume that the extrapolation uses the momentum measured by the MVTX and INTT to predict the hit location, and you show the distribution around the mean. The momenta we would actually be using would be a few hundred MeV/c to maybe 1 GeV/c, and we would not have the momentum from a precise TPC measurement until we have already corrected for space charge effects. It may be that we can take the TPC space points at the space charge crossover point to get a better estimate of the track momentum, but otherwise we rely on the momentum measurement by the MVTX + INTT for the extrapolation. Can you try it with a continuous range of particle momenta?
Best regards
Tony
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 7:16 PM
To: christof.roland AT cern.ch
Cc: jhuang AT bnl.gov; Todoroki, Takahito; Carlos Perez; Anthony Frawley; Chiu, Mickey; Sanghoon Lim; Molly Taylor; sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov; sphenix-maps-l
Subject: Re: Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL
On Oct 2, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch> wrote:
Hi Everybody,
since some of us are at the hard probes conference we will make thetask force meeting scheduled tomorrow virtual. There will not be an actualmeeting, but please post new material you would like to share on the indicopage or add it to the google doc so we can look at it offline and discuss by email
-
[Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Christof Roland, 10/02/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Ross Corliss, 10/04/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Anthony Frawley, 10/04/2018
- Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL, Christof Roland, 10/05/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Ross Corliss, 10/05/2018
- Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL, Anthony Frawley, 10/05/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Anthony Frawley, 10/04/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Meeting of the Inner Tracker Task Force VIRTUAL,
Ross Corliss, 10/04/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.