Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-maps-l - Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] In-time vertexing with INTT

sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: sookhyun lee <dr.sookhyun.lee AT gmail.com>
  • To: ming AT bnl.gov
  • Cc: sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov, sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] In-time vertexing with INTT
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:52:51 -0500

Hi Ming,

Yes, so far I only used 1 INTT layer to discriminate against out-of-time events. We certainly should reconstruct tracks using 2 MVTX hit + (2+) INTT hits at next iteration, but 2 MVTX hits only won't provide good starting curvature (for phi segmentation) or z0 parameter (for z segmentation) for INTT, thus cannot be used for in-time vertexing. I did not apply any pT cut on tracks used for vertexing.

Best regards,
Sookhyun  

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:14 PM Ming Liu <ming AT bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Sookhyun,
Nice work! So in your analysis, only one INTT hit was used to tag in-time association to a MVTX triplets? How about if you only use MVTX tracklet with two hits only? Have you applied any minimum momentum cuts?

Cheers 
Ming

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 9, 2018, at 9:52 AM, sookhyun lee <dr.sookhyun.lee AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hello everyone, 

Please find my updates on in-time vertexing with INTT below.

 
Let us have discussions tomorrow at Inner tracking task force meeting as well.

Best regards,
Sookhyun
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-MAPS-l mailing list
sPHENIX-MAPS-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-maps-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page