Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-maps-l - Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting

sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ross Corliss <rcorliss AT mit.edu>
  • To: "christof.roland AT cern.ch" <Christof.Roland AT cern.ch>
  • Cc: "Chiu, Mickey" <chiu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, Sanghoon Lim <sanghoon.lim AT colorado.edu>, "sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Molly Taylor <mitay AT mit.edu>, sphenix-maps-l <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Todoroki, Takahito" <todoroki AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:39:19 +0000

Dear All,

Though not mission critical, it seems a nice point of polish if we coordinate our plots.  I propose:
zppp=red
00pp= 'cool blue' (per Christof)
0ppp=green
0000=black
Is there value in showing 000p, 00zp, or 0pzp?  Four is a convenient number for subdividing crowded plots into four copies, and for putting all trendlines on the same plot, but I don't want to leave out an important scenario.

-Ross

On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:01 PM, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch> wrote:

Hi Everybody, 

sorry for the late announcement. Tomorrow we will have the last 
task force meeting before the collaboration meeting where we will have to give 
the final report on the findings of our studies. 

The indico agenda can be found here:


The bluejeans connection can be found here:


See you tomorrow

   Christof  




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page