sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX MAPS tracker discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting
- From: Ming Liu <ming AT bnl.gov>
- To: Sanghoon Lim <shlim AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>
- Cc: "Chiu, Mickey" <chiu AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, sphenix-intt-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Molly Taylor <mitay AT mit.edu>, sphenix-maps-l <sphenix-maps-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Todoroki, Takahito" <todoroki AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 21:12:59 -0700
Sanghoon, Nice work, very encouraging results. On your slide #8, you showed the tracking efficiency is fairly insensitive to INTT deadmap (4% vs 8%). Is this due to the fact you only require N_INTT_Cluster >=1 or the N_MVTX_Clust >=2 effectively removes most of the out-of-time tracks? Probably a combination of these two, I guess.
I am wondering whether 4INTT_PP can already provide sufficient redundancy or we still like to have the 3rd layer INTT?
Cheers, Ming
-- Ming Xiong Liu P-25, MS H846 TEL: 505-667-7125 Physics Division 631-344-7821(BNL) LANL 630-840-5708(FNAL) Los Alamos, NM 87545 FAX: 505-665-7020
From: Sanghoon Lim <shlim AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Hi all,
I've checked a couple of things based on the last meeting and uploaded slides with the update and a few performance plots.
The pileup event generator also put events in the same beam crossing of the signal event to take into account multiple collisions in one beam crossing. The remaining tracks from pileup events even the requirement of 2 MVTX clusters and 1 INTT clusters are actually due to the case of multiple collisions close in z within the same beam crossing. Hope plots in the slide are clear enough.
Best, Sanghoon
> Physics Department > ---------------------------------------------
|
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Sanghoon Lim, 12/01/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Ming Liu, 12/01/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
sookhyun lee, 12/01/2018
- Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting, Ming Liu, 12/01/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Sanghoon Lim, 12/02/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Sanghoon Lim, 12/02/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Ming Liu, 12/02/2018
- Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting, Sanghoon Lim, 12/04/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Ming Liu, 12/02/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Sanghoon Lim, 12/02/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
sookhyun lee, 12/01/2018
-
Re: [Sphenix-maps-l] Next Tracker Task Force Meeting,
Ming Liu, 12/01/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.